Skillquality 0.51

review-implementation

Review implementation against provided markdown requirements, specs, PRDs, or phase docs; optionally apply focused fixes. Use when a user supplies .md file paths and asks to verify correctness/completeness, check PRD phase completion, find missing or overbuilt work, assess critic

Price
free
Protocol
skill
Verified
no

What it does

Review Implementation

Overview

Review code against markdown requirements and produce evidence-backed findings. When the user asks for fixes, apply targeted changes that bring the implementation back to the docs without expanding scope.

Modes

  • Use review-only mode when the user asks to review, assess, audit, verify, or find issues.
  • Use fix mode when the user asks to fix, update, refactor, complete, apply changes, or make the implementation match the docs.
  • In fix mode, keep changes minimal and reversible. Do not add features that are not justified by the docs.

Workflow

1) Intake and Discovery Gate

  • Read all provided .md files and extract explicit requirements, constraints, and acceptance criteria.
  • Read repo guidance such as AGENTS.md, README, architecture notes, and existing task or PRD files when relevant.
  • Inspect affected code, tests, fixtures, routes, schemas, migrations, services, components, permissions, config, and observability surfaces as needed.
  • Identify the current behavior, expected behavior, data flow, integration points, validation options, and likely blast radius.
  • Ask only when a critical decision cannot be made safely after discovery.

2) Map Requirements to Evidence

  • Build an internal traceability map: requirement -> status -> code evidence -> gap -> action.
  • Classify each requirement as satisfied, partial, missing, conflicting, overbuilt, or deferred.
  • Use file/line evidence for important claims. Do not rely on general impressions when code can be inspected.

3) Run Multi-Pass Review

Review in this order:

  1. Requirements coverage: every requirement is satisfied or explicitly unresolved.
  2. Correctness: happy paths, edge cases, errors, empty states, permissions, state transitions, and rollback behavior are handled.
  3. Integration: changed modules fit together without contract breaks, duplicated ownership, or hidden assumptions.
  4. Simplicity: the solution is no more complex than necessary.
  5. Cleanup: repeated logic, dead code, temporary code, noisy logs, unused files, and unused dependencies are removed.
  6. Security/privacy: auth, access control, secrets, sensitive data, injection risks, and audit needs are safe.
  7. Performance: expensive queries, N+1 patterns, unnecessary renders, redundant network calls, and blocking work are addressed.
  8. Validation: chosen checks are appropriate for the risk.
  9. Documentation/operability: docs, release notes, migrations, rollback, monitoring, or support notes are updated when required.

Treat overbuilt code as a review finding when it adds features, abstractions, state, dependencies, or workflow paths not required by the docs.

4) Apply Focused Fixes

  • Fix issues directly in code with minimal, targeted changes.
  • Split overly long files/functions only when the split reduces real review or maintenance risk.
  • Remove or simplify overbuilt code that is not justified by the docs.
  • Preserve existing patterns unless the docs or code evidence justify a change.
  • If PRD or phase files are part of the request, update checkboxes, validation notes, discoveries, and change logs only when implementation evidence supports the update.

5) Validate with Evidence

  • Choose the smallest sufficient validation for the risk: static checks, unit tests, integration tests, API-level E2E, browser/UI checks, simulator checks, screenshots, manual smoke checks, or observability checks.
  • Run relevant checks when available and appropriate. If checks are unavailable, too costly, or not allowed, state the gap and use the best available evidence.
  • Do not run broad or expensive validation by reflex when a narrower check proves the changed behavior.

Report Format

Lead with the result that matters most:

  • In review-only mode, list findings first in severity order with file/line references, then summarize coverage, validation, and residual risk.
  • In fix mode, summarize fixes applied, validation performed, and any remaining findings or risks.
  • If no issues are found, say so clearly and name any validation gaps.
  • For critical blockers, stop and ask. For non-critical ambiguity, make the best reasonable decision, record the assumption, and continue.

Capabilities

skillsource-golbinskill-review-implementationtopic-agent-skillstopic-code-reviewtopic-codextopic-implementation-reviewtopic-prdtopic-review-implementationtopic-skills-sh

Install

Quality

0.51/ 1.00

deterministic score 0.51 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 110 github stars · SKILL.md body (4,275 chars)

Provenance

Indexed fromgithub
Enriched2026-04-21 18:55:41Z · deterministic:skill-github:v1 · v1
First seen2026-04-20
Last seen2026-04-21

Agent access