Skillquality 0.45

note-promotion

Decide whether material should become a stable, reusable, linkable Obsidian note. Load when user asks to upgrade, promote, or stabilize material into a formal note. Do NOT use for inbox triage, link discovery, or weekly synthesis.

Price
free
Protocol
skill
Verified
no

What it does

note-promotion

Constraints

  • NEVER promote everything; require stability + reuse + independence
  • NEVER polish before deciding; score first, format only if promoting
  • NEVER create notes without integration targets (minimum 2 links)
  • NEVER write without user confirmation
  • NEVER overwrite source voice; preserve strong original phrasing

Trigger Boundary

Use when: upgrade material into formal note, decide if finding is worth preserving, turn synthesis output into stable note, create linkable knowledge unit, user says "promote" or "stabilize."

Do NOT use for:

  • First-pass inbox routing -> inbox-triage
  • Note relationship discovery -> connection-review
  • Week-level meaning extraction -> weekly-synthesis
  • Vault system health diagnosis -> vault-health-feedback

Boundaries

  • Owns: promotion decision, note type selection, integration planning, write execution
  • Delegates to: connection-review (new note needs integration links), inbox-triage (material too raw)
  • Never absorbs: inbox routing, relationship analysis, synthesis, health diagnosis

Continuations

ConditionNext skill
New promoted note needs integration linksconnection-review
Material fails promotion test, return to inboxinbox-triage
Promotion decision is ambiguous after scoringEscalate to human

Companion Skill

All vault operations follow obsidian-mcp. Forbidden: obsidian_patch_note, obsidian_append_to_note. Verify every write through readback.

Procedure

Phase 1: Score

When scoring, read references/examples.md for promotion calibration.

Apply promotion test (>=3/5 to promote):

CriterionScoreEvidence required
Stable (not transient fragment)0/1Has persisted or been referenced again
Reusable (future value)0/1Applicable beyond original context
Independent (standalone)0/1Understandable without source capture
Connectable (links exist)0/1Can link to existing theme/project/question
Compression benefit0/1Clearer or more retrievable than source

Score < 3: recommend wait / keep raw / archive. Score >= 3: proceed to Phase 2.

Phase 2: Type Selection

TypeUse when
reference-noteStable external knowledge or method
idea-notePersonal framing, observation, or judgment
project-noteMainly useful inside active work
topic-noteMultiple notes need a conceptual home
synthesis-noteCross-note understanding worth preserving
contradiction-noteImportant tension deserves explicit framing
question-noteThe question itself is worth returning to

Phase 3: Plan

Define: title, tags, links (integration targets), write strategy (create new or merge into existing).

Phase 4: Execute (after user confirmation only)

When writing promoted notes, read references/templates.md for note structure.

  1. obsidian_write_note overwrite:false for new notes
  2. obsidian_replace_in_note for merging into existing
  3. Read back and verify frontmatter, content, links
<details> <summary>Edge Cases (expand when decision is unclear)</summary>
  • Material scores 3/5 but all points are weak: default to "wait" -- borderline cases benefit from time
  • Material is excellent but has zero link targets: cannot promote yet; suggest creating a topic-note first
  • Source is a synthesis output: check if synthesis-note type is appropriate or if the thesis deserves idea-note treatment
  • Multiple candidates from same source: promote the strongest one; note others as "watch" items
  • Material overlaps with existing note: merge strategy preferred over creating near-duplicates
</details>

Gotchas

Gotcha 1: Promoting every good idea

What happens: Agent marks most material as worth promoting Why it is wrong: Creates hollow vault growth; promoted notes without stability become noise Correct approach: Apply scoring strictly; default to "wait" when uncertain

Gotcha 2: Promotion as polishing

What happens: Agent rewrites and beautifies content without deciding if promotion is warranted Why it is wrong: Polishing is not promotion; a well-written fragment is still a fragment Correct approach: Score first, decide promote/wait, THEN format if promoting

Gotcha 3: Island notes without links

What happens: Agent creates a promoted note with no links to existing knowledge Why it is wrong: Unlinked notes are undiscoverable; defeats the purpose of promotion Correct approach: Require at least 2 integration targets before writing

Validators (CI only, not runtime)

  • validators/pre-check.sh: Confirms source material exists and is readable
  • validators/post-check.sh: Verifies promoted note has frontmatter, >=2 links, and correct type tag

Exit Criteria

  • Promotion decision is explicit with score and per-criterion evidence
  • Weak material has not been polished into fake clarity
  • Integration targets are named (>=2 links)
  • If written: note exists, frontmatter correct, content reads back correctly

Capabilities

skillsource-r007b34rskill-note-promotiontopic-agent-skillstopic-ai-agentstopic-ai-toolstopic-claude-code-skillstopic-digital-gardentopic-knowledge-basetopic-knowledge-managementtopic-knowledge-workflowtopic-llmtopic-mcptopic-mcp-servertopic-model-context-protocol

Install

Quality

0.45/ 1.00

deterministic score 0.45 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 6 github stars · SKILL.md body (5,131 chars)

Provenance

Indexed fromgithub
Enriched2026-05-18 13:22:59Z · deterministic:skill-github:v1 · v1
First seen2026-05-18
Last seen2026-05-18

Agent access