coderabbit
This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage coderabbit", "check coderabbit comments", "analyze coderabbit review", "fetch coderabbit findings", "coderabbit PR", "review coderabbit suggestions", "run coderabbit review", "coderabbit review", "review with coderabbit", or
What it does
CodeRabbit Review Triage
Fetch and analyze CodeRabbit review comments from a GitHub PR, or run a local CodeRabbit CLI review. Default mode fetches from the remote PR. Use --local to run the CLI against local diffs.
Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS for:
<pr-number>— integer PR number<pr-url>— GitHub PR URL (e.g.,https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123), extract the PR number from the path--local— switch to local review mode (see below)
Mode Dispatch
If $ARGUMENTS contains --local, strip it and forward remaining arguments to references/local-review.md. Follow that workflow instead of continuing here. All flags after --local (--base, --base-commit, --type, --config) are forwarded to the local workflow.
Otherwise, continue with the PR comment analysis workflow below.
Prerequisites
Run these checks in order. Stop at the first failure.
1) GitHub CLI Authenticated
gh auth status
If not authenticated, stop and tell the user to run gh auth login.
2) Detect Repository
gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '"\(.owner.login)/\(.name)"'
Store the result as {owner}/{repo}.
3) Resolve PR Number
- If a PR number was provided as an argument, use it directly.
- If a PR URL was provided, extract the number from the URL path.
- If neither was provided, auto-detect from the current branch:
gh pr view --json number --jq '.number' 2>/dev/null
If auto-detection fails, stop: "No open PR found for the current branch. Provide a PR number or URL, or use --local for local review."
4) Validate PR
gh pr view {pr_number} --json state,url --jq '"\(.state) \(.url)"'
If the command fails, the PR does not exist. Report and stop. Otherwise, note the state (OPEN/MERGED/CLOSED) and URL for the report scope section.
Workflow
1) Fetch CodeRabbit Comments
Fetch from three GitHub API endpoints, filtering for the CodeRabbit bot. Use --paginate for large PRs. The bot's login is coderabbitai but may appear as coderabbitai[bot], so match with startswith.
Walkthrough/summary comments (issue comments where CodeRabbit posts its walkthrough):
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments" \
--paginate \
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login | startswith("coderabbitai"))]'
Review objects (top-level review body and state):
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews" \
--paginate \
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login | startswith("coderabbitai"))]'
Inline review comments (file-level comments with path and line info):
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments" \
--paginate \
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login | startswith("coderabbitai"))]'
If no CodeRabbit comments are found across all three endpoints, report "No CodeRabbit review found on PR #{pr_number}" and stop.
2) Parse Comments into Findings
Process the raw API responses into a normalized list of findings:
- From inline comments (
pulls/{pr}/comments): Each comment becomes a finding withpath(from.path),line(from.lineor.original_line),body(the comment text),diff_hunk(surrounding context), andsource: "inline". These are the primary source of actionable findings. - From review bodies (
pulls/{pr}/reviews): Parse each review'sbodyfor actionable items. Extract individual suggestions. Marksource: "review". - From issue comments (
issues/{pr}/comments): Parse for file-level summaries and actionable items within the walkthrough. Marksource: "walkthrough".
Inline comments are the primary source of actionable findings. Review summaries and walkthrough comments provide context and may surface additional actionable items not tied to specific lines.
3) Triage Findings
Load references/triage.md and follow the shared triage process — categorize, classify, confirm ambiguous, generate fix plan, and report.
Stop Conditions
Stop and ask for direction when:
ghCLI is not authenticated.- The PR does not exist or is not accessible.
- No CodeRabbit comments found on the PR.
- Auto-detection fails and no PR number was provided.
- A finding requires architectural changes beyond the PR's scope.
- Classification confidence is low for code on critical paths (auth, payments, data integrity).
Capabilities
Install
Quality
deterministic score 0.47 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 50 github stars · SKILL.md body (4,365 chars)