positioning-messaging
Create a Positioning & Messaging Pack (positioning statement, messaging hierarchy, value prop, copy set).
What it does
Positioning & Messaging
Scope
Covers
- Positioning (category, ICP, differentiation, “against what alternative”)
- Messaging hierarchy (core message + pillars + proof)
- Value proposition + copy primitives (one-liner, tagline, headline/subhead, elevator pitch)
- Channel adaptation (website, sales, press pattern-matching)
- Lightweight message validation plan
When to use
- “We need clearer positioning and messaging.”
- “Rewrite our value prop / one-liner / tagline / homepage hero.”
- “People don’t ‘get it’—pipeline is sluggish and sales keeps re-explaining.”
- “Create a messaging hierarchy and proof points for <ICP>.”
- “Give me 5 headline/tagline options that fit our positioning.”
When NOT to use
- You need to decide what to build (use a problem definition / strategy workflow first)
- You need a full brand identity system (visual identity guidelines, logo, UI kit)
- You need only copyediting/tone-polish of existing copy with no positioning change
- You don’t have (or refuse to assume) an ICP/use case and “alternative” to position against
- You need a deep competitive landscape analysis before positioning (use
competitive-analysis) - You want to craft a brand narrative, origin story, or thought leadership content (use
brand-storytelling) - You need to set or change your pricing and packaging structure (use
pricing-strategy) - You’re planning a launch campaign with channels, timeline, and assets (use
launch-marketing)
Inputs
Minimum required
- Product: what it is + what it does (1–3 sentences)
- Target audience (ICP/persona) and primary use case / job-to-be-done
- Primary alternative(s): status quo, competitor, internal build, agency, manual workaround
- Differentiators + proof (features, results, customer quotes, credibility signals)
- Primary surface(s): website hero, sales pitch, deck, ads, press, app onboarding
- Constraints: tone/voice, compliance/claims, taboo words, time box
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
- If answers aren’t available, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns. Provide 2–3 alternate positioning directions if uncertainty is high.
Outputs (deliverables)
Produce a Positioning & Messaging Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):
- Context snapshot (decision, ICP, use case, surfaces, constraints)
- Positioning brief (category + “against” alternative + differentiation + proof + tradeoffs)
- Messaging hierarchy (core message + 3 pillars + proof points + objections)
- Copy set (one-liner, elevator pitch, tagline options, homepage hero headline/subhead, CTA suggestions)
- Consistency enablement (“say this / not that”, internal script, sales talk track)
- Validation plan (how to test for understanding + recall; next iteration loop)
- Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)
Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Workflow (8 steps)
1) Intake + success definition
- Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md.
- Actions: Clarify ICP, use case, primary surface(s), and what “better” means (pipeline response, conversion, comprehension, recall).
- Outputs: Context snapshot.
- Checks: A stakeholder can answer: “Who is this for, and what will this messaging change?”
2) Choose the “against” alternative + category frame
- Inputs: Known competitors/status quo; market context.
- Actions: Identify the real alternative in the decision (status quo/workaround/competitor). Choose a category frame and a simple pattern match (“<category> for <audience>”).
- Outputs: “Against” alternative + category statement options.
- Checks: The category is understandable without a glossary; the “against” alternative is explicit.
3) Write the positioning brief (specific, with tradeoffs)
- Inputs: Differentiators + proof.
- Actions: Draft a positioning statement and supporting brief: value, differentiation, proof, and what you don’t do (tradeoffs/non-goals).
- Outputs: Positioning brief.
- Checks: The positioning could not plausibly fit 3 different competitors; proof is concrete or labeled “to validate”.
4) Build a messaging hierarchy (listener-first)
- Inputs: Positioning brief; audience pains/goals; objections.
- Actions: Create: core message → 3 pillars → proof points. Add “what we mean / what we don’t mean” to prevent confusion.
- Outputs: Messaging hierarchy + proof bank.
- Checks: A first-time reader can restate the value in one sentence; message is memorable (see checklist).
5) Generate copy primitives (tight + pattern-matched)
- Inputs: Messaging hierarchy; target surfaces.
- Actions: Draft one-liner, elevator pitch, tagline options, and hero headline/subhead. Keep it direct; use pattern matching when helpful (especially for press).
- Outputs: Copy set (v1).
- Checks: Copy is concrete (specific nouns/verbs), avoids vague superlatives, and matches the category frame.
6) Create consistency + enablement assets
- Inputs: Copy set; internal stakeholders; sales/support needs.
- Actions: Produce “say this / not that”, internal description script, and a short sales talk track + “reset” explanation for confused prospects.
- Outputs: Consistency enablement section.
- Checks: Two different team members would describe the product the same way.
7) Draft a validation plan (understanding + recall)
- Inputs: Channels + time box; access to customers/prospects.
- Actions: Propose a lightweight test plan: comprehension (“what is it?”), relevance (“is this for you?”), and recall (“what do you remember tomorrow?”). Include 5–8 test questions and a decision rule.
- Outputs: Validation plan + iteration loop.
- Checks: Plan is feasible given constraints; includes a clear “revise/keep” rule.
8) Quality gate + finalize
- Inputs: Draft pack.
- Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
- Outputs: Final Positioning & Messaging Pack.
- Checks: The pack is usable as-is by marketing + sales + founders; assumptions are explicit.
Quality gate (required)
- Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.
- Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.
Examples
Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “We’re an AI QA tool for customer support teams. Create positioning + messaging and 5 homepage hero options.”
Expected: positioning brief (against ‘manual QA + spreadsheets’), messaging pillars with proof, one-liner/taglines, hero headline/subhead set, and validation questions.
Example 2 (Marketplace): “We’re moving upmarket. Reposition for IT managers and draft an elevator pitch + sales talk track.”
Expected: revised category frame and “against” alternative, updated messaging hierarchy for the new buyer, pitch + talk track, and a short enablement section.
Boundary example: “Write me a logo and brand identity.” Response: decline visual identity work; offer to produce positioning/messaging and a brief for a brand designer.
Boundary example 2: “Analyze our top 5 competitors and tell me how we stack up.”
Response: a full competitive landscape analysis is better served by competitive-analysis. This skill uses your competitive context as an input to positioning, but does not produce a standalone competitive analysis.
Anti-patterns (common failure modes)
- Positioning by committee: Trying to be everything to everyone by including every stakeholder's wish in the messaging. Strong positioning requires explicit trade-offs and non-goals--you must choose who you are NOT for.
- Feature-first messaging: Leading with technical features (“AI-powered analytics engine”) instead of the customer outcome or transformation (“see what's driving churn in 30 seconds, not 30 days”).
- Undifferentiated superlatives: Using words like “best”, “leading”, “innovative”, or “cutting-edge” that every competitor also uses. Differentiation must be specific and provable.
- No “against” alternative: Positioning in a vacuum without naming what the buyer is comparing you to (status quo, competitor, manual workaround). Without an explicit alternative, the positioning has no anchor.
- Messaging without validation: Shipping messaging based on internal brainstorming alone, without testing for comprehension and recall with real prospects. The validation plan is not optional.
Capabilities
Install
Quality
deterministic score 0.47 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 49 github stars · SKILL.md body (8,685 chars)