sprint-review-summarizer
Transform sprint notes into a structured stakeholder doc: delivered, deferred, risks, next focus. No Jira needed. Use when preparing sprint review or stakeholder updates from free-form PM notes. Triggers: 'sprint review summary', 'summarize sprint results', 'итоги спринта', 'офор
What it does
Sprint Review Summarizer
This skill transforms plain-language sprint summary notes into a structured stakeholder document covering delivered items, deferred work, risks, and next sprint focus. It works from any free-form text or markdown file — no integrations, no YAML, no Jira required.
Input:
- Sprint notes as pasted text or markdown file (any format accepted)
- Optional: sprint number, team name, sprint goal (for metadata enrichment)
Output:
- Markdown stakeholder document with sections: Executive Summary, Delivered, Deferred, Risks & Issues, Next Sprint Focus, Key Decisions (if detected)
Language Detection
Detect the user's language from their message:
- If Russian (or contains Cyrillic): respond in Russian
- If English (or other Latin-script language): respond in English
- If ambiguous: respond in the language of the trigger phrase used
Instructions
Step 1: Validate and Parse Input
-
Check that sprint notes content is provided (pasted text or file reference)
- If input is empty or whitespace only: Stop. Return: "No sprint notes provided. Paste your sprint summary or provide a file path."
-
Check input format
- If input resembles a structured Jira/CSV export (column headers, ID fields, etc.): Inform the user — "This looks like a structured export, not plain-language notes. This skill works best with free-form sprint notes." Offer to attempt processing if user confirms.
- Otherwise: proceed with parsing
-
Extract optional sprint metadata if present in notes:
- Sprint name or number (e.g., "Sprint 24", "Q2 Sprint 3")
- Dates (e.g., "May 5–19")
- Team name
- Sprint goal
- If metadata is missing: use placeholder "Sprint [YYYY-MM-DD]" for the heading and continue without blocking
Step 2: Classify Items into Four Categories
-
Read all content and identify discrete items (sentences, bullet points, paragraphs describing work)
-
Map each item to one of four categories using semantic heuristics:
Delivered — signals: "shipped", "done", "released", "completed", "launched", "finished", "delivered", "closed", "fixed", "resolved"
Deferred — signals: "pushed", "moved", "postponed", "deferred", "not completed", "carried over", "slipped", "didn't make it", "won't be done this sprint"
Risks & Issues — signals: "blocked", "blocker", "risk", "concern", "dependency", "issue", "problem", "delay", "at risk", "needs attention", "escalate"
Next Sprint Focus — signals: "next sprint", "next", "plan", "priority", "upcoming", "focus for", "will start", "goal for next"
-
Handle items that span multiple categories:
- Place under the primary category
- Add a cross-reference note if secondary category is relevant (e.g., item in Delivered that also carries a risk)
Edge Cases:
- If notes contain only delivered items: generate document with empty sections marked "None noted this sprint" — do not omit sections
- If notes are very short (1–3 sentences): extract what's possible; append note: "Source notes were minimal — document may be incomplete. Consider adding detail before sharing."
Step 3: Detect Key Decisions
- Scan for decision language: "decided", "agreed", "approved", "confirmed", "resolved to", "we will", "going with", "chose", "selected"
- If any decisions are detected: compile a Key Decisions list
- If no decisions detected: omit the Key Decisions section from output
Step 4: Calculate Completion Metric
- Count items in Delivered vs. total items (Delivered + Deferred)
- If quantifiable: include in Executive Summary as "N of M items delivered"
- If items cannot be counted (prose-only notes): use qualitative phrasing (e.g., "Core sprint goal achieved; 2 items deferred")
Step 5: Handle Multi-Sprint Input
- Check if notes reference multiple sprints (e.g., "Sprint 24", "Sprint 25" headers appear)
- If distinct sprint boundaries are detectable: generate separate sections per sprint
- If indistinguishable: process as one sprint and append note: "Notes may cover multiple sprints — review sections for accuracy."
Step 6: Format and Output Document
- Generate markdown document following the Output Format below
- Ensure all four core sections appear even if empty
- Validate no placeholder text is visible to the end user
Output Format
## Sprint Review: [Sprint Name or Date]
**Team:** [team name or "—"]
**Sprint dates:** [dates or "—"]
**Summary:** [1-sentence executive summary, e.g., "8 of 10 planned items delivered; 2 deferred to next sprint due to dependency blockers."]
---
### ✅ Delivered
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]
### ⏩ Deferred
- [Item 1 — reason if mentioned]
- *(None noted this sprint)*
### ⚠️ Risks & Issues
- [Risk or issue 1]
- *(None noted this sprint)*
### 🎯 Next Sprint Focus
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
### 📋 Key Decisions
- [Decision 1]
*(Section omitted if no decisions detected)*
Field rules:
- Executive Summary: one sentence, includes completion metric if quantifiable
- All four core sections always present, even if empty (use "None noted this sprint")
- Key Decisions section: only included when decisions are detected
- Output is copy-paste ready for email, Slack, or stakeholder update
Negative Cases
- Empty input: Stop before processing. Return: "No sprint notes provided. Paste your sprint summary or provide a file path."
- Jira/CSV structured export: Detect column-header patterns; warn user and offer to attempt anyway with confirmation
- Non-EN/RU language detected: Process in the detected language; generate output in same language
Capabilities
Install
Quality
deterministic score 0.45 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 7 github stars · SKILL.md body (5,627 chars)