deep-dive

Purpose

Use this skill when requirements are incomplete, conflicting, or too vague to begin implementation safely.

Trigger

• User asks for implementation but goals/constraints are still unclear
• Multiple interpretations exist for scope, acceptance criteria, or architecture direction
• Team needs a compact interview artifact before /omg:team-plan or /omg:team-prd

Workflow

1. Trace known facts from the request and current repository context.
2. Compute a simple clarity score (low, medium, high) for implementation readiness.
3. Run a structured interview pass:
   • essential questions (must answer before planning)
   • standard questions (quality/cost/risk tuning)
   • deep questions (edge-case and long-term maintainability)
4. Record assumptions explicitly and mark each as validated, pending, or risky.
5. Produce a launch brief that can be consumed by planning/execution stages.
6. If filesystem tools are available, update:
   • .omg/state/interview-context.json
   • .omg/state/launch-brief.md

Output Template

## Clarity Score
- level: low|medium|high
- rationale: ...

## Known Facts
- ...

## Open Questions
1. ...
2. ...

## Assumption Ledger
| Assumption | Status (validated/pending/risky) | Validation Path |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ... | ... | ... |

## Launch Brief
- objective:
- boundaries:
- acceptance hints:
- recommended next command:

Notes

• Keep output concise and operator-facing.
• Do not start coding when essential interview questions are unresolved.
• This skill remains extension-native (prompt/state level), without external daemons or runtime wrappers.