find-ai-consultancy
Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US AI/ML/data consulting firms (consultancies) — AI/ML development, MLOps, generative AI / LLM apps (RAG, chatbots, agents), computer vision, NLP, recommendation systems, data engineering, BI/analytics. Triggers on "f
What it does
find-ai-consultancy
Drive the ServiceGraph API (https://api.servicegraph.co) to find,
shortlist, and enrich US AI/ML and data consultancies. The catalog
tags firms with industry:data_ai_consulting and a 4-tag service
sub-taxonomy: ai-ml-development (the largest at ~12k firms),
data-analytics, cloud-services, and api-integration. Confirm
exact tag names via /v1/tags since taxonomy can drift between
catalog releases.
Always pin industry:data_ai_consulting. This skill exists to do
that automatically — the user shouldn't have to think about catalog
taxonomy.
Any HTTP client works (curl, fetch, requests). Examples below use curl.
Sibling skills — defer when scope is different
- General application or backend dev that just uses AI as a feature
(e.g. "build us a SaaS with an AI chatbot tab") →
find-software-developer. This skill is for engagements where the AI/ML/data work IS the deliverable. - Web/site projects that include some AI →
find-web-developer. - AI-related marketing or content →
find-marketing-agency.
If the user wants AI/ML/data engineering as the primary deliverable (model building, pipelines, agents, MLOps, BI), this skill applies.
When NOT to use this skill
- Consumer AI courses or learning ("find me an online course to learn ML") — out of scope; the catalog is firm-procurement.
- AI/LLM product comparisons ("ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini", "Cursor vs Copilot") — software-product questions, not procurement.
- DIY/code tasks ("how do I fine-tune Llama", "review this PyTorch training loop").
- In-house ML/data hires (Machine Learning Engineer, Data Scientist, ML Platform Engineer).
- Generic AI knowledge ("explain how transformers work").
- Non-US firms.
- Individual freelance ML engineers / data scientists.
If the user is a business procuring external AI/ML/data services, this skill applies — defaults to fire on B2B procurement intent.
MCP server (preferred for authed calls)
If your agent harness has the ServiceGraph MCP server loaded
(https://mcp.servicegraph.co), prefer its tools for the authed
tier (/search, /get, /stats). The MCP server uses OAuth 2.1 +
PKCE — the host harness handles credentials in its own audited
sandbox, so there's no .env.local, no shell dispatch, and no token
value ever enters the LLM context.
For the anonymous tier (/tags, /check, /explore), MCP is
not preferred — every MCP tool requires OAuth (the server has no
anonymous tier), so plain curl against the REST URL is the simpler
path for discovery calls. Use the REST patterns below for those.
The MCP tools 1:1-map to the public REST endpoints — same backend, same quota, same data:
| MCP tool | REST endpoint | Anon? | Recommended path |
|---|---|---|---|
list_tags | GET /v1/tags | yes | curl |
check_filter | GET /v1/check | yes | curl |
explore_firms | GET /v1/explore | yes | curl |
search_firms | GET /v1/search | no | MCP if loaded, else curl + OTP |
get_firm | GET /v1/get/:id | no | MCP if loaded, else curl + OTP |
catalog_stats | GET /v1/stats | no | MCP if loaded, else curl + OTP |
Detection: if you see any MCP tools with servicegraph in the
name (the harness-specific prefix varies — agents pattern-match the
substring), the ServiceGraph MCP server is loaded. Prefer those
tools for the authed tier; complete any auth flow the harness
initiates if needed. If no servicegraph MCP tools are present,
fall through to the REST + OTP flow below for the authed tier.
The four-tier funnel
| Tier | Auth | Cost | Use it for |
|---|---|---|---|
GET /v1/tags | none | free | First call of every session. Discover legal field names, kinds, operators, values. |
GET /v1/check?filter=... | none | free | Validate a filter before spending an explore/search call. |
GET /v1/explore?filter=... | none | free, IP-throttled | Scope: count + breakdowns. Use to size the candidate pool before quota-spending. |
GET /v1/search?filter=... | bearer | 200 unique firms / month free | Brief firm cards. No url, no contact info. Use for ranking / shortlisting. |
GET /v1/get/:id | bearer | 50 unique firms / month free | Full bundle: url, phone, email, social, legal name, address. Only call for shortlisted firms. |
POST /v1/research | paid | not in MVP | Deferred — skip. |
Quota rule that matters: /search and /get charge per unique
firm viewed per calendar month, not per call. Re-paging the same
query is free. Two different filters that overlap charge once for
the overlap. Re-fetching a firm you already pulled this month is free.
Session-start ritual
Before constructing any filter, call:
GET https://api.servicegraph.co/v1/tags?include_values=1
Cache the response for the conversation. Confirm data_ai_consulting
is present in the industry value list. The relevant sub-tags under
service_provided are ai-ml-development, data-analytics,
cloud-services, and api-integration — verify exact names before
constructing filters with service_provided: predicates.
Field kinds you'll use most:
- categorical:
industry(alwaysdata_ai_consulting),state,pricing_model,company_size_signal,geography_served— op: - tag_set_with_evidence:
service_provided(e.g.ai-ml-development,data-analytics,cloud-services,api-integration) — op:with optional@evidence - numeric:
rating,review_count_total,founded_year— ops= >= <= > < - presence:
has:phone,has:clutch,has:rating,has:linkedin_company, … - keyword: free-text substring across firm name / brand / title / meta / legal_name. Sub-niches like RAG, LLM, MLOps, computer vision, NLP, recommendation systems are typically keyword-only.
Auth
/tags, /check, and /explore are anonymous. /search and /get
require a bearer token.
Security model — keep the token out of the LLM context.
- Never read
.env,.env.local, or any other credential file into your context. The token's literal value should never appear in the conversation. - Use shell dispatch for every authed request so the token flows
directly from the user's environment / dotenv file into the
Authorizationheader without round-tripping through the LLM. - Always ask the user once per session before using a detected
token, even if it's already in their shell or
.env.local.
Resolution rule:
-
Detect whether a token is available — without reading its value. Run a shell check that only inspects exit codes:
( [ -n "${SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN:-}" ] \ || grep -qs '^SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN=' .env.local \ || grep -qs '^SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN=' .env )Exit code
0= token is available somewhere; non-zero = no token. -
Confirm with the user before the first authed call this session:
"I found a
SERVICEGRAPH_TOKENin your environment /.env.local. OK to use it for ServiceGraph API requests this session?"If the user says no, stay on the anonymous tiers (
/tags,/check,/explore) and skip authed calls. Don't re-ask later unless the user asks for authed work. -
Dispatch via shell — every authed call goes through a shell wrapper so the literal token never enters the conversation:
# If exported in the shell environment: curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN" \ 'https://api.servicegraph.co/v1/search?filter=...' # If in .env.local — source it inside a subshell so it doesn't # leak into the parent shell either: ( set -a; . ./.env.local; set +a; curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN" \ 'https://api.servicegraph.co/v1/search?filter=...' )Capture the response body to a tmp file or jq-process it, but do NOT echo the request command with the token expanded.
-
OTP flow if no token is detected — capture the new token directly into
.env.localwithout surfacing its value to the LLM:# 1. trigger the email — agent prompts the user for $EMAIL curl -fsS -X POST 'https://api.servicegraph.co/v1/auth/request-otp' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d "{\"email\":\"$EMAIL\"}" # 2. exchange the code — agent prompts the user for $CODE. # The ?format=env query param returns SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN=<token> # as plain text appended to .env.local — no jq needed. The -f # flag makes curl exit non-zero on 4xx so a wrong code doesn't # pollute the file (the error mirror is also a `# comment` line, # safe to ignore even if it lands). curl -fsS -X POST 'https://api.servicegraph.co/v1/auth/verify-otp?format=env' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d "{\"email\":\"$EMAIL\",\"code\":\"$CODE\",\"name\":\"claude-cli\"}" \ >> .env.local # 3. confirm capture without revealing the value grep -q '^SERVICEGRAPH_TOKEN=' .env.local && echo "OTP token captured."After a successful capture, the user has implicitly consented (they just completed the flow), so proceed to dispatch (step 3). The token is now persistent in
.env.localfor future sessions. -
If a
/searchor/getreturns401 unauthorizedmid-session, the token expired or was revoked — re-run the OTP flow.
Filter DSL
One query parameter, GitHub-search-style.
filter := orExpr
orExpr := andExpr ("OR" andExpr)*
andExpr := notExpr (("AND")? notExpr)* # whitespace = implicit AND
notExpr := ("NOT" | "-") notExpr | atom
atom := "(" filter ")" | predicate
predicate:= IDENT op valueOrList | bareword
op := ":" | "=" | ">=" | "<=" | ">" | "<"
valueOrList := value ("," value)*
value := IDENT | NUMBER | tagAtEvidence
tagAtEvidence := IDENT "@" ("low"|"medium"|"high")
bareword := IDENT | NUMBER # → keyword:<bareword>
Four rules that bite:
- AND binds tighter than OR.
a OR b cparses asa OR (b AND c). Use parens. - Comma list = OR within one predicate.
state:CA,NY,TXmatches any of the three. - Negation is
-xorNOT x. Negative literals inside a comma list are not allowed:state:CA,-NYis rejected. Usestate:CA -state:NY. - Bareword = keyword search. Any IDENT or NUMBER not followed by an operator becomes a free-text substring across name / brand / title / meta / legal_name. Multiple barewords AND.
AI-flavored examples (validate yours with /v1/check):
industry:data_ai_consulting service_provided:ai-ml-development
industry:data_ai_consulting service_provided:ai-ml-development@high state:CA
industry:data_ai_consulting service_provided:data-analytics pipelines
industry:data_ai_consulting llm rag
industry:data_ai_consulting computer vision healthcare
industry:data_ai_consulting mlops
industry:data_ai_consulting (service_provided:ai-ml-development OR service_provided:data-analytics)
industry:data_ai_consulting service_provided:ai-ml-development@high rating>=4 has:clutch
When in doubt, hit /v1/check?filter=... first.
Sub-niche → keyword/tag mapping:
| User asks for | Use |
|---|---|
| AI/ML model building | service_provided:ai-ml-development |
| Data engineering / pipelines | service_provided:data-analytics + keywords pipelines/engineering (no data-engineering tag exists) |
| BI / analytics | service_provided:data-analytics (covers BI too — no separate business-intelligence tag) |
| Cloud architecture for data/ML | service_provided:cloud-services |
| API integration / data integration | service_provided:api-integration |
| LLM apps / RAG / agents | llm, rag, agent (keywords) |
| Generative AI | generative ai, genai (keywords) |
| Computer vision | computer vision, cv (keywords) |
| NLP / IDP / document understanding | nlp, idp, document understanding |
| MLOps / model deployment | mlops, deployment |
| Recommendation systems | recommendation, recsys |
| Predictive analytics / churn / forecasting | predictive, forecasting, churn |
firm_id contract
firm_id is a stable 12-hex-char handle:
firm_id = sha256(apex.lower().rstrip(".")).hexdigest()[:12]
import hashlib
def firm_id(apex):
return hashlib.sha256(apex.lower().rstrip(".").encode()).hexdigest()[:12]
echo -n "scaleai.com" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z' \
| openssl dgst -sha256 -hex | awk '{print substr($2,1,12)}'
Recipes
A. AI/ML consultancy for a recommendation engine
User: "AI/ML consultancy to build our recommendation engine for an ecommerce site."
GET /v1/explore?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development+(recommendation OR recsys)+ecommerce
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development+recommendation+ecommerce&limit=10
GET /v1/get/<firm_id> # ×3
B. RAG / LLM consultancies for a chatbot
User: "Three RAG/LLM consultancies for an enterprise chatbot."
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+(rag OR llm)+chatbot+enterprise
If thin, drop enterprise and surface client-tier signals from
/get after.
C. Data engineering partner
User: "Data-engineering partner to build our analytics pipelines."
The catalog has no data-engineering tag — data-analytics is the
closest sub-tag and it covers both BI and engineering work. Pin the
tag and add keywords for the engineering flavor:
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:data-analytics+(pipelines OR engineering)
D. MLOps for model deployment
User: "MLOps consultancy to help us deploy models to production."
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+mlops
E. Indirect intent — "use AI to predict customer churn"
User: "We want to use AI to predict customer churn — who can help us build that?"
That's a custom-ML consulting ask in the predictive-analytics niche:
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development+(churn OR predictive)
If the user gave a vertical (SaaS, retail, telco), add it as a keyword.
F. Computer vision + healthcare vertical
User: "AI consultancies specializing in computer vision for healthcare."
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+computer vision+healthcare
G. Quality threshold + Fortune 500 clients
User: "Three AI/ML consulting firms with 4-star ratings and Fortune 500 clients."
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development@high+rating>=4&limit=10
The "Fortune 500" angle isn't structured — surface from briefs and
let the user pick, or add fortune as a keyword.
H. Custom LLM agent for customer service
User: "Custom LLM agent for our customer-service workflows."
GET /v1/search?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+(llm OR agent)+(customer service OR support)
I. BYO apex list — enrich domains the user already has
User pastes 8–20 AI consultancy domains. For each:
- Compute
firm_idlocally. GET /v1/get/<firm_id>— full bundle if in catalog, 404 if not.- Aggregate, present, flag the not-found ones to the user.
A 404 here often means the firm is actually a SaaS product company (many AI vendors brand as "AI services" but operate as a product) — not in the consulting catalog.
Gotchas
- Always pin
industry:data_ai_consulting. Without it,ai-ml-developmentas a service tag could surface IT firms that list AI as a sub-service. - Defer to
find-software-developerfor general dev that uses AI as a feature. When the deliverable is a SaaS product or app and AI is one of several features, that's software-dev work; this skill is for engagements where AI/ML/data work IS the deliverable. - Catalog audit notes: AI/ML-tagged firms have a higher historical rate of mis-classification (some are SaaS products, some are B2C ed-tech). The catalog has been audited but residual leakage is possible. If a
/getreturns a SaaS product, the agent should flag this and skip rather than recommend. - Many sub-niches are keyword-only. Multi-word sub-niches split into ANDed barewords (
computer vision→computerANDvision). - LLM-product comparisons (ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini, etc.) are NOT procurement — refuse those.
- AI courses for individuals (Coursera, fast.ai, Andrew Ng courses) are NOT in the catalog — refuse those.
looks_not_pro_services404 is not a bug. Afirm_idmay exist in/searchbut 404 on/getif it's been flagged. Skip and continue; not charged./v1/explorek=20 suppression. When fewer than 20 firms match, the response is{"count": "<20", "suppressed": true, "breakdowns": {}}. Drilling further makes the count smaller. Broaden or escalate to/v1/search.- Briefs from
/searchdo NOT includeapex,url,phone_primary,email_primary,legal_name, or address. If the user asks for contact info, you must/get/:id. - Quota is per-user-per-month, deduped on first view. Re-views are free; re-pagination is free.
Errors
All errors return JSON: {"error": {"code": "...", "message": "..."}}.
| Status | Code | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| 400 | filter_parse_error | Payload includes position. Fix the filter, re-validate with /v1/check. |
| 400 | filter_required | Empty filter where one is required. |
| 400 | invalid_firm_id | firm_id must be 12 lowercase hex chars. Re-derive. |
| 401 | unauthorized | Token missing/expired. Re-run OTP. |
| 404 | not_found | Firm not in catalog or flagged. Not charged. Skip and continue. |
| 429 | rate_limited | Honor Retry-After header / retry_after field. |
| 429 | monthly_quota_exhausted | Switch to /v1/explore-only mode for the rest of the month. Tell the user. |
End-to-end example
User: "Three AI/ML consultancies to build a recommendation engine for an ecommerce site, ideally with 4-star ratings and Fortune 500 clients."
GET /v1/tags?include_values=1
GET /v1/check?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development@high+(recommendation OR recsys)+ecommerce+rating>=4
GET /v1/explore?filter=industry:data_ai_consulting+service_provided:ai-ml-development@high+(recommendation OR recsys)+ecommerce+rating>=4
GET /v1/search?filter=...&limit=10
GET /v1/get/<firm_id> # ×3
End of session: report X-Quota-Remaining-Month.
Capabilities
Install
Quality
deterministic score 0.53 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 160 github stars · SKILL.md body (18,477 chars)