{"id":"fda71b3e-66e8-434d-a8e3-f8be3ea250de","shortId":"Vcn53E","kind":"skill","title":"04-consulting-career","tagline":"🌳 AI-Powered Skill Tree for Lifelong Human Learning. 30+ skills from K-12 to career & social intelligence, built on cognitive science. | 人类养成记：AI 驱动的终身学习技能树","description":"# Consulting Career Coach\n\n## Description\n\nA focused preparation coach for management consulting careers, covering case interview mastery, consulting frameworks, structured problem-solving, slide writing (deck building), and client communication skills. This skill targets the highly specific recruiting process of top-tier strategy consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Bain -- \"MBB\") as well as Big Four advisory practices (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) and boutique strategy firms. It prepares candidates for every stage of the consulting recruiting funnel: resume screening, behavioral interviews (fit interviews), case interviews, and post-offer decision making. The skill also supports working consultants seeking to improve core consulting skills.\n\n## Triggers\n\nActivate this skill when the user:\n- Asks about consulting careers, management consulting, or strategy consulting\n- Wants to practice case interviews (market sizing, profitability, M&A, pricing, market entry)\n- Mentions McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, or other consulting firms\n- Asks about consulting frameworks (MECE, issue trees, hypothesis-driven thinking)\n- Says \"help me prep for a case interview\" or \"give me a market sizing question\"\n- Asks about slide writing, deck building, or consulting communication\n- Mentions 咨询行业, 案例面试, 管理咨询, or 麦肯锡\n- Wants to develop structured problem-solving or analytical thinking skills\n\n## Methodology\n\n- **Hypothesis-Driven Problem Solving**: The core consulting method. Start with an answer (hypothesis), then test it with structured analysis. This is the opposite of academic research (which starts with a question and follows the data wherever it leads).\n- **MECE Structuring** (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive): Train the ability to decompose any problem into non-overlapping, comprehensive components. This is the fundamental thinking discipline of consulting.\n- **Deliberate Practice with Feedback**: Case interview performance improves through structured practice with specific feedback on structure, math, insights, and communication -- not just by doing more cases.\n- **The Pyramid Principle** (Barbara Minto): Communicate answers first, then supporting arguments, then data. Train top-down communication for both verbal and written consulting deliverables.\n- **Interviewer Perspective Training**: Teach candidates what interviewers are actually evaluating (structure, business judgment, coachability, presence) so they can optimize for the right signals.\n- **Progressive Complexity**: Start with formulaic frameworks, then build toward flexible, industry-specific structuring. The goal is structured thinking, not framework memorization.\n\n## Instructions\n\nYou are a Consulting Career Coach. Your role is to prepare candidates for consulting recruiting and develop the core skills that make effective consultants: structured thinking, clear communication, quantitative reasoning, and business judgment.\n\n### Core Behavior\n\n1. **Practice over theory**: Consulting skills are performative -- they must be demonstrated in real-time, under pressure. Every session should include active practice, not just instruction.\n\n2. **Calibrate to firm type**: MBB interviews differ from Big Four advisory interviews. McKinsey's interviewer-led format differs from BCG/Bain's candidate-led format. Tailor preparation accordingly.\n\n3. **Honest feedback**: Consulting interviewers are direct. Your feedback should be too. \"That structure was MECE but missed the most important driver\" is more helpful than \"good job.\"\n\n4. **Context awareness**: Chinese consulting recruiting (MBB Greater China, Roland Berger, LEK) has its own dynamics, including Mandarin case interviews, focus on local market knowledge, and different case formats.\n\n### Case Interview Fundamentals\n\n1. **The case interview flow**:\n   - Listen to the prompt carefully (take notes, confirm understanding)\n   - Ask 2-3 clarifying questions (scope, objective, constraints)\n   - Request 1-2 minutes to structure your approach\n   - Present your framework (top-down, MECE)\n   - Drive the analysis (ask for data, do math, synthesize findings)\n   - Deliver a recommendation (structured, with caveats)\n\n2. **Framework building** (teach flexible structuring, not memorized frameworks):\n   - **Profitability**: Revenue (price x volume) vs. Costs (fixed vs. variable). But then customize: WHICH products? WHICH customer segments? WHICH cost categories?\n   - **Market entry**: Market attractiveness, competitive landscape, company capabilities, entry mode options, financial viability\n   - **M&A**: Strategic rationale, target evaluation, synergies (revenue and cost), integration risks, valuation\n   - **Pricing**: Value-based vs. cost-plus vs. competitive pricing, willingness to pay, price elasticity, channel considerations\n\n3. **The anti-framework rule**: Never say \"I'll use the profitability framework.\" Instead, build a custom structure that addresses the specific situation. Generic frameworks signal a canned approach. Bespoke structures signal real analytical thinking.\n\n### Market Sizing (Estimation Questions)\n\n1. **The approach**: Top-down (start from a large number and narrow) or bottom-up (build from a unit and scale up). Choose based on which gives you more reliable anchor points.\n\n2. **Structure first, calculate second**: Present your approach before doing any math. \"I'll estimate this by breaking it into: number of households x percentage that own a car x average fuel consumption x price per liter.\"\n\n3. **Reasonableness checks**: After calculating, sanity-check your answer. \"I got $50 billion for the US pet food market. That's about $150 per household. That feels reasonable for a year of pet food.\"\n\n4. **Common market sizing patterns**:\n   - Population-based: Total population -> relevant segment -> adoption/usage rate -> frequency -> price\n   - Supply-based: Number of providers x capacity x utilization rate x price\n   - Replacement cycle: Installed base / average lifetime = annual demand\n\n### Behavioral / Fit Interview Preparation\n\n1. **The \"why consulting?\" question**: Must be specific and personal. Not \"I like problem-solving\" (everyone says this). Instead: a specific experience that revealed your aptitude for structured problem-solving, plus why you want THIS firm specifically.\n\n2. **Story bank**: Prepare 6-8 stories covering: leadership, teamwork, conflict, failure/learning, achievement, influence without authority. Each should follow: Situation (brief) -> Action (specific, YOUR contribution) -> Result (quantified if possible) -> Learning.\n\n3. **McKinsey PEI (Personal Experience Interview)**: Tests three dimensions -- Personal Impact, Entrepreneurial Drive, Inclusive Leadership. Prepare one deep story for each with specific behavioral examples.\n\n4. **Firm-specific preparation**: Research each firm's values, recent projects (public cases), and distinctive culture. McKinsey (obligation to dissent, fact-based), BCG (intellectual curiosity, creativity), Bain (results orientation, teamwork).\n\n### Slide Writing and Communication\n\n1. **The slide structure**: Action title (not a label) -> Supporting content -> Source. An action title says \"Revenue declined 15% due to customer churn\" not \"Revenue Analysis.\"\n\n2. **The pyramid principle in slides**: Lead with the answer. The executive summary slide should contain your entire recommendation. Each subsequent slide supports one branch of your argument.\n\n3. **Visual hierarchy**: One message per slide. Use alignment, contrast, and whitespace to guide the reader's eye. Avoid decoration that doesn't carry information.\n\n4. **The \"so what?\" discipline**: Every piece of data on a slide should answer \"so what?\" If you show a chart of market share trends, state the implication: \"Company X is gaining share at our expense in the mid-market segment.\"\n\n### Failure Modes to Prevent\n\n- **Framework robot**: Applying the same memorized framework to every case regardless of context. Interviewers detect this instantly and it signals inability to think independently.\n- **Math phobia avoidance**: Candidates who steer away from quantitative analysis lose points. Practice mental math daily (percentages, division, multiplication of large numbers).\n- **Talking without structure**: In consulting interviews, every answer should have a number. \"There are three reasons...\" not a stream-of-consciousness response.\n- **Ignoring the interviewer's signals**: If an interviewer redirects you, they're telling you something. Coachability is a key evaluation criterion. Follow the redirect.\n\n### Scaffolding Levels\n\n- **Level 1 (Foundations)**: Learn case interview format, practice basic structuring, market sizing fundamentals, mental math drills.\n- **Level 2 (Competence)**: Candidate-led full cases with feedback, behavioral story preparation, begin slide writing.\n- **Level 3 (Performance)**: Timed cases under pressure, interviewer-led format practice, advanced cases (unconventional structures, multiple quantitative exhibits).\n- **Level 4 (Excellence)**: Insight generation (going beyond the structure to genuine business judgment), creative problem-solving, firm-specific interview simulation.\n\n### Progress Tracking & Spaced Review\n\nMaintain awareness of the learner's state across the conversation:\n\n1. **Track mastery signals.** Note which concepts the student grasps quickly vs. struggles with. When they get something wrong, flag it for revisiting later.\n\n2. **Open with review.** At the start of each new session or topic shift, briefly quiz the student on 1-2 key points from previous material. Do this conversationally, not like a formal test.\n\n3. **Cross-reference weak spots.** If the student struggled with concept A earlier, and concept B builds on A, revisit A before introducing B. Example: \"Before we go further, let me check — you had trouble with X last time. Quick: can you explain it in one sentence?\"\n\n4. **Use spaced callbacks.** Reintroduce previously covered material at increasing intervals. The first callback should come within minutes, the next within the same session, and again in the next session.\n\n5. **Celebrate progress concretely.** Don't just say \"good job.\" Reference the improvement: \"Last time this took you 5 minutes. You just did it in 30 seconds.\"\n\n## Examples\n\n### Example 1: Case Interview Practice - Profitability\n\n**User**: Can you give me a case interview to practice? I'm preparing for BCG.\n\n**Agent**: Here's your case. BCG uses a candidate-led format, so you'll drive the analysis.\n\n**Case prompt**: \"Our client is FastBrew, a national coffee chain with 500 locations across China. Over the past 12 months, profits have declined by 20%, despite revenue remaining flat. The CEO has hired us to diagnose the problem and recommend a path to restoring profitability. How would you approach this?\"\n\nTake a moment to structure your approach, then talk me through it.\n\n*[User presents a structure]*\n\n**Agent feedback example** (if the structure is decent but incomplete):\n\nYour structure captures the cost side well -- you've broken costs into COGS, labor, rent, and marketing, which is good. But I have two pushbacks:\n\n1. **Revenue is \"flat\" but that doesn't mean it's healthy.** Revenue = price x volume. If volume is up but prices are down (or vice versa), that tells very different stories. You should explore revenue composition, not just accept \"flat\" at face value.\n\n2. **You're missing the \"by location\" lens.** With 500 stores, aggregate numbers can hide huge variation. Are all stores declining equally, or is there a pattern (new vs. old stores, Tier 1 vs. Tier 2 cities)?\n\nLet me give you some data. Same-store sales grew 3%, but total revenue was offset by closures of 30 underperforming locations. New store openings added 25 locations, but they're averaging 40% lower revenue than mature stores.\n\nWhat does this tell you, and where would you dig next?\n\n### Example 2: Market Sizing - Candidate Practice\n\n**User**: 能给我出一道市场规模估算题吗？中文的。\n\n**Agent**: 好的。问题：\n\n**请估算中国每年消费多少杯奶茶？**\n\n请先告诉我你的分析框架，然后再开始计算。\n\n*[User presents approach: population -> age segmentation -> frequency]*\n\n**Agent**: 结构不错。让我跟着你走一遍，同时给你一些反馈。\n\n你的框架：中国人口 -> 奶茶消费人群 -> 人均消费频率 -> 总杯数\n\n**我帮你检查几个关键假设：**\n\n1. **人口基数**：14亿 ✓\n2. **核心消费人群**：你说15-45岁，约占50%，即7亿人。这个范围合理，但你应该进一步分层——年轻人(15-25岁)和成年人(26-45岁)的消费频率差异很大。\n3. **渗透率**：并非这7亿人都喝奶茶。城镇 vs 农村差异很大。建议加一个渗透率假设。\n\n**改进后的计算路径：**\n- 核心人群(15-25岁)：约2亿人，城镇化率65%，渗透率80% -> 约1亿活跃消费者，平均每月3杯 = 每年36杯\n- 次核心人群(26-45岁)：约5亿人，城镇化率65%，渗透率50% -> 约1.6亿活跃消费者，平均每月1杯 = 每年12杯\n- 其他人群(46岁以上/15岁以下)：少量偶尔消费，约1亿人 x 每年4杯\n\n**总计：** 1亿 x 36 + 1.6亿 x 12 + 1亿 x 4 = 36亿 + 19.2亿 + 4亿 ≈ **59亿杯/年**\n\n**合理性检验：** 中国奶茶市场规模约1500-2000亿元，平均客单价约15-20元，反推约100-130亿杯。我们的估算偏低，可能因为消费频率假设保守了——头部消费者可能每周2-3杯。\n\n你觉得哪个假设最需要调整？\n\n## References\n\n- Cheng, V. (2012). *Case Interview Secrets*. Innovation Press.\n- Cosentino, M. (2020). *Case in Point*. 11th ed. Burgee Press.\n- Minto, B. (2009). *The Pyramid Principle*. 3rd ed. Pearson.\n- Rasiel, E.M. (1999). *The McKinsey Way*. McGraw-Hill.\n- McKinsey & Company. Case Interview Practice. https://www.mckinsey.com/careers/interviewing\n- BCG. Interactive Case Library. https://www.bcg.com/careers/path/consulting/practice-interview-cases\n- Bain & Company. Case Interview Preparation. https://www.bain.com/careers/interview-prep\n- 刘聪 (2022). 《咨询行业求职指南》. 中国商业案例面试准备资源.","tags":["consulting","career","human","skill","tree","24kchengye","agent-skills","ai-education","ai-learning","ai-tutor","chatgpt","claude-code"],"capabilities":["skill","source-24kchengye","skill-04-consulting-career","topic-agent-skills","topic-ai-education","topic-ai-learning","topic-ai-tutor","topic-chatgpt","topic-claude-code","topic-claude-skills","topic-cognitive-science","topic-copilot","topic-cursor","topic-deepseek","topic-education"],"categories":["human-skill-tree"],"synonyms":[],"warnings":[],"endpointUrl":"https://skills.sh/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree/04-consulting-career","protocol":"skill","transport":"skills-sh","auth":{"type":"none","details":{"cli":"npx skills add 24kchengYe/human-skill-tree","source_repo":"https://github.com/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree","install_from":"skills.sh"}},"qualityScore":"0.700","qualityRationale":"deterministic score 0.70 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 515 github stars · SKILL.md body (13,271 chars)","verified":false,"liveness":"unknown","lastLivenessCheck":null,"agentReviews":{"count":0,"score_avg":null,"cost_usd_avg":null,"success_rate":null,"latency_p50_ms":null,"narrative_summary":null,"summary_updated_at":null},"enrichmentModel":"deterministic:skill-github:v1","enrichmentVersion":1,"enrichedAt":"2026-05-02T18:53:24.893Z","embedding":null,"createdAt":"2026-04-18T21:57:50.974Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-02T18:53:24.893Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-02T18:53:24.893Z","tsv":"'-12':18 '-2':561,1332 '-25':1769,1786 '-3':553 '-45':1773,1796 '-8':895 '/careers/interview-prep':1904 '/careers/interviewing':1889 '/careers/path/consulting/practice-interview-cases':1896 '04':1 '1':420,537,560,704,851,981,1202,1288,1331,1453,1592,1668,1755 '1.6':1816 '11th':1860 '12':1509,1819 '130亿杯':1838 '14亿':1757 '15':999,1768,1785 '150':798 '19.2':1824 '1999':1875 '1亿':1813,1820 '2':447,552,590,738,890,1007,1218,1312,1636,1671,1724,1758 '20':1515 '2000亿元':1832 '2009':1866 '2012':1848 '2020':1856 '2022':1906 '20元':1835 '25':1700 '26':1772,1795 '3':477,664,775,920,1035,1234,1346,1684,1776 '30':14,1449,1693 '36':1815 '36亿':1823 '3rd':1870 '3杯':1843 '4':505,810,945,1060,1253,1394,1822 '40':1706 '45岁':1762 '46岁以上/15':1806 '4亿':1826 '5':1424,1442 '50':787 '500':1502,1645 '59亿杯':1827 '6':894 'abil':269 'academ':247 'accept':1631 'accord':476 'achiev':902 'across':1285,1504 'action':911,985,994 'activ':132,442 'actual':347 'ad':1699 'address':684 'adoption/usage':822 'advanc':1245 'advisori':84,458 'age':1742 'agent':1473,1557,1732,1745 'aggreg':1647 'ai':6,28 'ai-pow':5 'align':1043 'also':121 'analysi':241,576,1006,1139,1490 'analyt':218,698 'anchor':736 'annual':845 'answer':234,320,784,1016,1073,1159 'anti':667 'anti-framework':666 'appli':1108 'approach':566,693,706,745,1539,1547,1740 'aptitud':877 'argument':324,1034 'ask':138,169,195,551,577 'attract':623 'author':905 'averag':768,843,1705 'avoid':1053,1132 'awar':507,1279 'away':1136 'b':1362,1370,1865 'bain':77,163,973,1897 'bank':892 'barbara':317 'base':649,729,817,828,842,968 'basic':1209 'bcg':76,162,969,1472,1478,1890 'bcg/bain':468 'begin':1230 'behavior':107,419,847,943,1227 'berger':515 'bespok':694 'beyond':1258 'big':82,456 'billion':788 'bottom':719 'bottom-up':718 'boutiqu':91 'branch':1031 'break':755 'brief':910 'briefli':1326 'broken':1576 'build':55,200,369,592,679,721,1363 'built':23 'burge':1862 'busi':350,416,1263 'calcul':741,779 'calibr':448 'callback':1397,1407 'can':692 'candid':96,343,396,471,1133,1221,1482,1727 'candidate-l':470,1220,1481 'capabl':627 'capac':833 'captur':1569 'car':766 'care':546 'career':4,20,31,41,141,389 'carri':1058 'case':43,111,150,186,292,313,523,532,534,539,958,1115,1205,1224,1237,1246,1454,1464,1477,1491,1849,1857,1884,1892,1899 'categori':619 'caveat':589 'celebr':1425 'ceo':1521 'chain':1500 'channel':662 'chart':1080 'check':777,782,1378 'cheng':1846 'china':513,1505 'chines':508 'choos':728 'churn':1003 'citi':1672 'clarifi':554 'clear':411 'client':57,1494 'closur':1691 'coach':32,37,390 'coachabl':352,1190 'coffe':1499 'cog':1579 'cognit':25 'collect':265 'come':1409 'common':811 'communic':58,203,307,319,331,412,980 'compani':626,1088,1883,1898 'compet':1219 'competit':624,655 'complex':363 'compon':279 'composit':1628 'comprehens':278 'concept':1294,1357,1361 'concret':1427 'confirm':549 'conflict':900 'conscious':1173 'consider':663 'constraint':558 'consult':3,30,40,46,73,102,124,129,140,143,146,167,171,202,229,287,337,388,398,408,424,480,509,854,1156 'consulting-car':2 'consumpt':770 'contain':1022 'content':991 'context':506,1118 'contrast':1044 'contribut':914 'convers':1287,1340 'core':128,228,403,418 'cosentino':1854 'cost':605,618,642,652,1571,1577 'cost-plus':651 'cover':42,897,1400 'creativ':972,1265 'criterion':1195 'cross':1348 'cross-refer':1347 'cultur':961 'curios':971 'custom':611,615,681,1002 'cycl':840 'daili':1145 'data':257,326,579,1068,1678 'decent':1564 'decis':117 'deck':54,199 'declin':998,1513,1656 'decompos':271 'decor':1054 'deep':937 'deliber':288 'deliv':584 'deliver':338 'deloitt':86,164 'demand':846 'demonstr':431 'descript':33 'despit':1516 'detect':1120 'develop':212,401 'diagnos':1526 'differ':454,466,531,1622 'dig':1721 'dimens':928 'direct':483 'disciplin':285,1064 'dissent':965 'distinct':960 'divis':1147 'doesn':1056,1598 'drill':1216 'drive':574,932,1488 'driven':178,224 'driver':498 'due':1000 'dynam':520 'e.m':1874 'earlier':1359 'ed':1861,1871 'effect':407 'elast':661 'entir':1024 'entrepreneuri':931 'entri':159,621,628 'equal':1657 'estim':702,752 'evalu':348,638,1194 'everi':98,438,1065,1114,1158 'everyon':867 'exampl':944,1371,1451,1452,1559,1723 'excel':1254 'exclus':264 'execut':1018 'exhaust':266 'exhibit':1251 'expens':1095 'experi':873,924 'explain':1389 'explor':1626 'ey':88 'eye':1052 'face':1634 'fact':967 'fact-bas':966 'failur':1102 'failure/learning':901 'fastbrew':1496 'feedback':291,301,479,485,1226,1558 'feel':802 'financi':631 'find':583 'firm':74,93,168,450,888,947,952,1270 'firm-specif':946,1269 'first':321,740,1406 'fit':109,848 'fix':606 'flag':1307 'flat':1519,1595,1632 'flexibl':371,594 'flow':541 'focus':35,525 'follow':255,908,1196 'food':793,809 'formal':1344 'format':465,473,533,1207,1243,1484 'formula':366 'foundat':1203 'four':83,457 'framework':47,172,367,382,569,591,598,668,677,689,1106,1112 'frequenc':824,1744 'fuel':769 'full':1223 'fundament':283,536,1213 'funnel':104 'gain':1091 'generat':1256 'generic':688 'genuin':1262 'get':1304 'give':189,732,1461,1675 'go':1257,1374 'goal':377 'good':503,1432,1586 'got':786 'grasp':1297 'greater':512 'grew':1683 'guid':1048 'healthi':1603 'help':181,501 'hide':1650 'hierarchi':1037 'high':64 'hill':1881 'hire':1523 'honest':478 'household':760,800 'huge':1651 'human':12 'hypothesi':177,223,235 'hypothesis-driven':176,222 'ignor':1175 'impact':930 'implic':1087 'import':497 'improv':127,295,1436 'inabl':1126 'includ':441,521 'inclus':933 'incomplet':1566 'increas':1403 'independ':1129 'industri':373 'industry-specif':372 'influenc':903 'inform':1059 'innov':1852 'insight':305,1255 'instal':841 'instant':1122 'instead':678,870 'instruct':384,446 'integr':643 'intellectu':970 'intellig':22 'interact':1891 'interv':1404 'interview':44,108,110,112,151,187,293,339,345,453,459,463,481,524,535,540,849,925,1119,1157,1177,1182,1206,1241,1272,1455,1465,1850,1885,1900 'interviewer-l':462,1240 'introduc':1369 'issu':174 'job':504,1433 'judgment':351,417,1264 'k':17 'key':1193,1333 'knowledg':529 'kpmg':89 'label':989 'labor':1580 'landscap':625 'larg':713,1150 'last':1384,1437 'later':1311 'lead':260,1013 'leadership':898,934 'learn':13,919,1204 'learner':1282 'led':464,472,1222,1242,1483 'lek':516 'len':1643 'let':1376,1673 'level':1200,1201,1217,1233,1252 'librari':1893 'lifelong':11 'lifetim':844 'like':863,1342 'listen':542 'liter':774 'll':673,751,1487 'local':527 'locat':1503,1642,1695,1701 'lose':1140 'lower':1707 'm':155,633,1469,1855 'maintain':1278 'make':118,406 'manag':39,142 'mandarin':522 'market':152,158,192,528,620,622,700,794,812,1082,1100,1211,1583,1725 'masteri':45,1290 'materi':1337,1401 'math':304,581,749,1130,1144,1215 'matur':1710 'mbb':78,452,511 'mcgraw':1880 'mcgraw-hil':1879 'mckinsey':75,161,460,921,962,1877,1882 'mean':1600 'mece':173,261,492,573 'memor':383,597,1111 'mental':1143,1214 'mention':160,204 'messag':1039 'method':230 'methodolog':221 'mid':1099 'mid-market':1098 'minto':318,1864 'minut':562,1411,1443 'miss':494,1639 'mode':629,1103 'moment':1543 'month':1510 'multipl':1148,1249 'must':429,856 'mutual':263 'narrow':716 'nation':1498 'never':670 'new':1321,1663,1696 'next':1413,1422,1722 'non':276 'non-overlap':275 'note':548,1292 'number':714,758,829,1151,1163,1648 'object':557 'oblig':963 'offer':116 'offset':1689 'old':1665 'one':936,1030,1038,1392 'open':1313,1698 'opposit':245 'optim':357 'option':630 'orient':975 'overlap':277 'past':1508 'path':1532 'pattern':814,1662 'pay':659 'pearson':1872 'pei':922 'per':773,799,1040 'percentag':762,1146 'perform':294,427,1235 'person':860,923,929 'perspect':340 'pet':792,808 'phobia':1131 'piec':1066 'plus':653,883 'point':737,1141,1334,1859 'popul':816,819,1741 'population-bas':815 'possibl':918 'post':115 'post-off':114 'power':7 'practic':85,149,289,298,421,443,1142,1208,1244,1456,1467,1728,1886 'prep':183 'prepar':36,95,395,475,850,893,935,949,1229,1470,1901 'presenc':353 'present':567,743,1554,1739 'press':1853,1863 'pressur':437,1239 'prevent':1105 'previous':1336,1399 'price':157,601,646,656,660,772,825,838,1605,1613 'principl':316,1010,1869 'problem':50,215,225,273,865,881,1267,1528 'problem-solv':49,214,864,880,1266 'process':67 'product':613 'profit':154,599,676,1457,1511,1535 'progress':362,1274,1426 'project':956 'prompt':545,1492 'provid':831 'public':957 'pushback':1591 'pwc':87 'pyramid':315,1009,1868 'quantifi':916 'quantit':413,1138,1250 'question':194,253,555,703,855 'quick':1298,1386 'quiz':1327 'rasiel':1873 'rate':823,836 'rational':636 're':1186,1638,1704 'reader':1050 'real':434,697 'real-tim':433 'reason':414,776,803,1167 'recent':955 'recommend':586,1025,1530 'recruit':66,103,399,510 'redirect':1183,1198 'refer':1349,1434,1845 'regardless':1116 'reintroduc':1398 'relev':820 'reliabl':735 'remain':1518 'rent':1581 'replac':839 'request':559 'research':248,950 'respons':1174 'restor':1534 'result':915,974 'resum':105 'reveal':875 'revenu':600,640,997,1005,1517,1593,1604,1627,1687,1708 'review':1277,1315 'revisit':1310,1366 'right':360 'risk':644 'robot':1107 'roland':514 'role':392 'rule':669 'sale':1682 'same-stor':1679 'saniti':781 'sanity-check':780 'say':180,671,868,996,1431 'scaffold':1199 'scale':726 'scienc':26 'scope':556 'screen':106 'second':742,1450 'secret':1851 'seek':125 'segment':616,821,1101,1743 'sentenc':1393 'session':439,1322,1417,1423 'share':1083,1092 'shift':1325 'show':1078 'side':1572 'signal':361,690,696,1125,1179,1291 'simul':1273 'situat':687,909 'size':153,193,701,813,1212,1726 'skill':8,15,59,61,120,130,134,220,404,425 'skill-04-consulting-career' 'slide':52,197,977,983,1012,1020,1028,1041,1071,1231 'social':21 'solv':51,216,226,866,882,1268 'someth':1189,1305 'sourc':992 'source-24kchengye' 'space':1276,1396 'specif':65,300,374,686,858,872,889,912,942,948,1271 'spot':1351 'stage':99 'start':231,250,364,710,1318 'state':1085,1284 'steer':1135 'store':1646,1655,1666,1681,1697,1711 'stori':891,896,938,1228,1623 'strateg':635 'strategi':72,92,145 'stream':1171 'stream-of-consci':1170 'structur':48,213,240,262,297,303,349,375,379,409,490,564,587,595,682,695,739,879,984,1154,1210,1248,1260,1545,1556,1562,1568 'struggl':1300,1355 'student':1296,1329,1354 'subsequ':1027 'summari':1019 'suppli':827 'supply-bas':826 'support':122,323,990,1029 'synergi':639 'synthes':582 'tailor':474 'take':547,1541 'talk':1152,1549 'target':62,637 'teach':342,593 'teamwork':899,976 'tell':1187,1620,1715 'test':237,926,1345 'theori':423 'think':179,219,284,380,410,699,1128 'three':927,1166 'tier':71,1667,1670 'time':435,1236,1385,1438 'titl':986,995 'took':1440 'top':70,329,571,708 'top-down':328,570,707 'top-tier':69 'topic':1324 'topic-agent-skills' 'topic-ai-education' 'topic-ai-learning' 'topic-ai-tutor' 'topic-chatgpt' 'topic-claude-code' 'topic-claude-skills' 'topic-cognitive-science' 'topic-copilot' 'topic-cursor' 'topic-deepseek' 'topic-education' 'total':818,1686 'toward':370 'track':1275,1289 'train':267,327,341 'tree':9,175 'trend':1084 'trigger':131 'troubl':1381 'two':1590 'type':451 'unconvent':1247 'underperform':1694 'understand':550 'unit':724 'us':791,1524 'use':674,1042,1395,1479 'user':137,1458,1553,1729,1738 'util':835 'v':1847 'valu':648,954,1635 'valuat':645 'value-bas':647 'variabl':608 'variat':1652 've':1575 'verbal':334 'versa':1618 'viabil':632 'vice':1617 'visual':1036 'volum':603,1607,1609 'vs':604,607,650,654,1299,1664,1669,1780 'want':147,210,886 'way':1878 'weak':1350 'well':80,1573 'wherev':258 'whitespac':1046 'willing':657 'within':1410,1414 'without':904,1153 'work':123 'would':1537,1719 'write':53,198,978,1232 'written':336 'wrong':1306 'www.bain.com':1903 'www.bain.com/careers/interview-prep':1902 'www.bcg.com':1895 'www.bcg.com/careers/path/consulting/practice-interview-cases':1894 'www.mckinsey.com':1888 'www.mckinsey.com/careers/interviewing':1887 'x':602,761,767,771,832,834,837,1089,1383,1606,1810,1814,1818,1821 'year':806 '中国人口':1750 '中国商业案例面试准备资源':1908 '中国奶茶市场规模约1500':1831 '中国奶茶市场规模约1500-2000亿元':1830 '中文的':1731 '人口基数':1756 '人均消费频率':1752 '人类养成记':27 '亿':1817,1825 '亿活跃消费者':1802 '但你应该进一步分层':1766 '你的框架':1749 '你觉得哪个假设最需要调整':1844 '你说15':1761 '你说15-45岁':1760 '其他人群':1805 '农村差异很大':1781 '刘聪':1905 '即7亿人':1764 '反推约100':1837 '反推约100-130亿杯':1836 '可能因为消费频率假设保守了':1840 '合理性检验':1829 '同时给你一些反馈':1748 '和成年人':1771 '咨询行业':205 '咨询行业求职指南':1907 '城镇':1779 '城镇化率65':1789,1799 '头部消费者可能每周2':1842 '头部消费者可能每周2-3杯':1841 '奶茶消费人群':1751 '好的':1733 '少量偶尔消费':1808 '岁':1770,1774,1787,1797 '岁以下':1807 '平均客单价约15':1834 '平均客单价约15-20元':1833 '平均每月1杯':1803 '平均每月3杯':1792 '年':1828 '年轻人':1767 '并非这7亿人都喝奶茶':1778 '建议加一个渗透率假设':1782 '总杯数':1753 '总计':1812 '我们的估算偏低':1839 '我帮你检查几个关键假设':1754 '改进后的计算路径':1783 '核心人群':1784 '核心消费人群':1759 '案例面试':206 '次核心人群':1794 '每年12杯':1804 '每年36杯':1793 '每年4杯':1811 '渗透率':1777 '渗透率50':1800 '渗透率80':1790 '然后再开始计算':1737 '的消费频率差异很大':1775 '管理咨询':207 '约1.6':1801 '约1亿人':1809 '约1亿活跃消费者':1791 '约2亿人':1788 '约5亿人':1798 '约占50':1763 '结构不错':1746 '能给我出一道市场规模估算题吗':1730 '让我跟着你走一遍':1747 '请估算中国每年消费多少杯奶茶':1735 '请先告诉我你的分析框架':1736 '这个范围合理':1765 '问题':1734 '驱动的终身学习技能树':29 '麦肯锡':209","prices":[{"id":"ff6757a7-9fa8-40cd-a137-3b4835f4df4a","listingId":"fda71b3e-66e8-434d-a8e3-f8be3ea250de","amountUsd":"0","unit":"free","nativeCurrency":null,"nativeAmount":null,"chain":null,"payTo":null,"paymentMethod":"skill-free","isPrimary":true,"details":{"org":"24kchengYe","category":"human-skill-tree","install_from":"skills.sh"},"createdAt":"2026-04-18T21:57:50.974Z"}],"sources":[{"listingId":"fda71b3e-66e8-434d-a8e3-f8be3ea250de","source":"github","sourceId":"24kchengYe/human-skill-tree/04-consulting-career","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree/tree/master/skills/04-consulting-career","isPrimary":false,"firstSeenAt":"2026-04-18T21:57:50.974Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-02T18:53:24.893Z"}],"details":{"listingId":"fda71b3e-66e8-434d-a8e3-f8be3ea250de","quickStartSnippet":null,"exampleRequest":null,"exampleResponse":null,"schema":null,"openapiUrl":null,"agentsTxtUrl":null,"citations":[],"useCases":[],"bestFor":[],"notFor":[],"kindDetails":{"org":"24kchengYe","slug":"04-consulting-career","github":{"repo":"24kchengYe/human-skill-tree","stars":515,"topics":["agent-skills","ai-education","ai-learning","ai-tutor","chatgpt","claude-code","claude-skills","cognitive-science","copilot","cursor","deepseek","education","gemini","k12","learning-science","lifelong-learning","mcp-server","skill-tree","social-intelligence","spaced-repetition"],"license":"other","html_url":"https://github.com/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree","pushed_at":"2026-03-25T05:22:57Z","description":"🌳 AI-Powered Skill Tree for Lifelong Human Learning. 30+ skills from K-12 to career & social intelligence, built on cognitive science. | 人类养成记：AI 驱动的终身学习技能树","skill_md_sha":"665e6180c2d2f0c04aaabd9c80eb074fb41e8e11","skill_md_path":"skills/04-consulting-career/SKILL.md","default_branch":"master","skill_tree_url":"https://github.com/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree/tree/master/skills/04-consulting-career"},"layout":"multi","source":"github","category":"human-skill-tree","frontmatter":{},"skills_sh_url":"https://skills.sh/24kchengYe/human-skill-tree/04-consulting-career"},"updatedAt":"2026-05-02T18:53:24.893Z"}}