{"id":"f19ce0ae-2f91-48d7-b0b0-8145dc2234f3","shortId":"SJnu6d","kind":"skill","title":"engagement-pricing","tagline":"Develop consulting pricing models and commercial strategy for engagements. Use when structuring fees (fixed, T&M, value-based, retainer, outcome-based), building rate cards, modeling engagement economics, setting payment terms, analyzing margins, planning discount strategy, or pr","description":"# Engagement Pricing\n\nStructure pricing models, rate cards, engagement economics, and commercial terms for consulting engagements. Balance the firm's margin requirements with competitive positioning and client value delivery.\n\n---\n\n## The Pricing Process\n\n### Step 1: Assess Engagement Characteristics\n\nThe right pricing model depends on the engagement, not on preference. Understand what you're pricing before deciding how to price it.\n\n**Engagement factors that drive model selection:**\n\n| Factor | Assessment Range | Pricing Implication |\n|---|---|---|\n| Scope clarity | Defined / Fuzzy / Evolving | Clear scope enables fixed fee; fuzzy scope needs T&M or retainer |\n| Duration | Weeks / Months / Ongoing | Longer engagements favor retainers or phased fixed fees |\n| Deliverables | Tangible / Advisory / Implementation | Tangible deliverables support fixed fee; advisory work suits retainer |\n| Risk level | Low / Medium / High | Higher risk warrants premium or risk-sharing model |\n| Client relationship | New / Existing / Strategic | Strategic accounts may warrant investment pricing |\n| Outcome measurability | Measurable / Partially / Not measurable | Measurable outcomes enable value-based or outcome-based pricing |\n\n**Pricing model options:**\n\n| Model | How It Works | Best When | Risk Profile |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Time & Materials (T&M) | Bill hours/days at agreed rates | Scope is undefined or evolving; discovery phases; staff augmentation | Low risk to consultant, high to client |\n| Fixed Fee | Agreed price for defined scope | Scope is clear and stable; deliverables are concrete; you've done similar work before | High risk to consultant (scope creep), low to client |\n| Retainer | Monthly fee for access and availability | Ongoing advisory relationships; predictable recurring needs; strategic accounts | Medium to both sides |\n| Value-Based | Fee linked to value delivered | Client outcomes are quantifiable; ROI is clear and large; you can credibly claim attribution | Low risk to consultant if structured well |\n| Outcome-Based | Fee tied to achieving specific results | Clear metrics exist; you have significant control over outcomes; client trusts measurement | Shared risk; high upside potential |\n| Risk/Reward | Base fee plus performance bonus | Client wants skin in the game; results are measurable; relationship supports transparency | Shared risk; aligns incentives |\n| Hybrid | Combine models (e.g., T&M with a cap, fixed fee + success bonus) | Complex engagements with both defined and undefined components | Tailored risk sharing |\n\n**Model selection logic:**\n\nCan you define the scope precisely? If yes, lean toward fixed fee. If no, lean toward T&M or retainer.\n\nCan you measure the value you'll create? If yes, consider value-based or outcome-based pricing, especially if the value is large relative to fees.\n\nIs this an ongoing relationship? If yes, retainer or hybrid models create stability for both sides.\n\n### Step 2: Develop the Rate Structure\n\nRates are the foundation of every pricing model, even when you don't show them to the client.\n\n**Rate card development:**\n\n| Level | Typical Daily Rate Range | What Drives the Rate |\n|---|---|---|\n| Partner/Director | Top of range | Client relationship, deal origination, quality assurance, experience premium |\n| Principal/Associate Director | Upper-mid range | Workstream leadership, client management, senior problem-solving |\n| Manager/Engagement Manager | Mid range | Day-to-day delivery, team management, analysis oversight |\n| Senior Consultant | Lower-mid range | Core analytical work, deliverable production, client interaction |\n| Consultant | Lower range | Analytical support, research, deliverable drafting |\n| Analyst | Entry range | Data gathering, modeling support, research |\n\n**Rate determination factors:**\n\n| Factor | Direction | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|\n| Market rates | Benchmark | What competitors charge for comparable work |\n| Specialization premium | Up | Scarce expertise commands higher rates |\n| Relationship/volume | Down | Strategic accounts and large commitments earn discounts |\n| Scope certainty | Up for uncertain | Risk premium for poorly defined work |\n| Urgency | Up | Timeline pressure warrants premium |\n| Location/delivery model | Variable | On-site typically higher than remote; offshore lower |\n| Competitive pressure | Down | If the client has alternatives, rates may flex |\n\n**Team composition and leverage:**\n\nThe team mix drives both cost and perceived value. Higher partner/principal involvement signals seniority but raises fees. Higher analyst/consultant leverage reduces fees but may concern clients about junior staffing.\n\nTypical leverage ratios by engagement type:\n\n| Engagement Type | Partner:Manager:Consultant Ratio | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|\n| Strategy | 1:1:2 | High-judgment work, senior-heavy |\n| Operations improvement | 1:2:4 | Process work, more execution-heavy |\n| Implementation | 1:3:6 | Execution-intensive, more junior resource |\n| Due diligence | 1:1:3 | Time-pressured, analytical |\n| Advisory retainer | 1:1:1 | Senior-focused, relationship-driven |\n\n### Step 3: Model Engagement Economics\n\nBuild the cost model to understand your margins before you price.\n\n**Direct costs:**\n\n| Category | What to Include |\n|---|---|\n| Personnel | Fully loaded cost of team time (salary + benefits + overhead, not billing rate) |\n| Travel | Flights, hotels, meals, ground transport (if on-site) |\n| Third-party costs | Licensed data, specialist subcontractors, tools, software |\n| Materials | Printing, production costs for deliverables |\n\n**Indirect costs and overhead:**\n\n| Category | Typical Range |\n|---|---|\n| Firm overhead allocation | 15-30% of direct personnel cost |\n| Business development cost | 5-10% (the cost of winning the work) |\n| Risk contingency | 5-15% depending on scope certainty |\n\n**Margin analysis:**\n\n| Metric | What It Tells You |\n|---|---|\n| Gross margin (fee minus direct cost) | Whether the engagement covers its direct costs with room to spare |\n| Contribution margin (fee minus all allocated costs) | Whether the engagement contributes to firm profitability |\n| Realization rate (actual fee / standard rate card value) | How much of your rate card you're actually capturing |\n| Effective daily rate (total fee / total days worked) | What you're actually earning per day across the team |\n\nTarget margins vary by firm size and market position, but as a general guide:\n- Gross margin below 40% is a warning sign\n- Gross margin of 50-65% is healthy for most consulting firms\n- Gross margin above 70% suggests you may be underinvesting in the engagement\n\n### Step 4: Structure Commercial Terms\n\nCommercial terms are where pricing meets contracting. Get these wrong and a well-priced engagement still loses money.\n\n**Payment structure options:**\n\n| Structure | When to Use |\n|---|---|\n| Monthly invoicing | T&M engagements; straightforward, predictable |\n| Milestone-based | Fixed fee engagements; ties payment to deliverable acceptance |\n| Upfront + milestones | New clients or large engagements; reduces payment risk |\n| Monthly retainer | Retainer models; predictable for both sides |\n| Outcome-triggered | Value/outcome-based; payment when results are achieved |\n\n**Payment schedule design:**\n\nFor fixed-fee or milestone-based engagements, front-load payments to match your cost profile. You incur most costs early (team ramp-up, research, analysis); your payment schedule should reflect that.\n\nA typical schedule:\n- 20-30% at contract signature or kickoff\n- 30-40% at interim milestones (spread across 1-2 milestones)\n- 30-40% at final deliverable acceptance\n\nNever put more than 40% of the fee on final acceptance. If the client delays acceptance, you're financing the engagement.\n\n**Standard commercial terms:**\n\n| Term | Standard Position | Negotiation Notes |\n|---|---|---|\n| Payment terms | Net 30 | Push back on Net 60+; it's a financing cost you're absorbing |\n| Expense policy | Reimbursed at cost, pre-approved | Cap expenses as a % of fees if the client insists |\n| Intellectual property | Client owns client-specific work product; firm retains methodologies and tools | Non-negotiable on methodology; flexible on work product |\n| Confidentiality | Mutual NDA | Standard; rarely contentious |\n| Liability cap | 1-2x total fees | Don't accept unlimited liability |\n| Termination | 30-day notice; payment for work completed | Protect against sudden termination; include kill fee for fixed-fee work |\n| Scope changes | Written change order process with pricing | Essential for fixed-fee; protects against scope creep |\n\n**IP and licensing considerations:**\n\nFor engagements involving proprietary tools, models, or software:\n- License vs. transfer: License your tools for use; don't transfer ownership\n- Usage rights: Define whether the client can use deliverables internally only or share with affiliates\n- Derivative works: Clarify who owns improvements built on your methodology\n\n### Step 5: Discount and Negotiation Strategy\n\nEvery engagement involves negotiation. Have a strategy before you enter the room.\n\n**Discount types and when to use them:**\n\n| Discount Type | Typical Range | Justification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Volume | 5-15% | Multiple engagements or large scope commitment |\n| Relationship/strategic | 5-10% | Long-term partnership, reference client, marquee logo |\n| Early payment | 2-5% | Payment within 10-15 days (a genuine financing benefit to you) |\n| Competitive | 5-10% | When you need to win and the client has credible alternatives |\n| Pilot/land-and-expand | 10-20% | First engagement priced to win, with expansion opportunity |\n\n**Negotiation principles:**\n\n- **Know your walk-away point** before you start. Calculate the minimum fee that delivers acceptable margin. Below that, you're buying the work, not winning it.\n- **Never discount without getting something back.** Longer commitment, faster payment, case study rights, reference-ability, expanded scope.\n- **Discount the total, not the rates.** Cutting your rate card devalues your people. Instead, reduce hours, adjust team composition, narrow scope, or provide a lump-sum discount. Protect the rate card.\n- **Show value first, price second.** If the client is focused on fee before they understand value, you're in a cost negotiation, not a value conversation.\n- **Use anchoring.** Present your recommended option alongside a higher-priced premium option and a stripped-down economy option. The middle option looks reasonable by comparison.\n\n**Pricing sensitivity analysis:**\n\nModel three scenarios before presenting:\n\n| Scenario | Assumptions | Fee | Margin |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Base case | Scope as defined, standard team, no complications | Target fee | Target margin |\n| Upside | Scope expands, additional phases, premium positioning | Higher fee | Higher margin |\n| Downside | Scope narrows, competitive pressure, discount applied | Floor fee | Minimum acceptable margin |\n\n### Step 6: Build the Value Case\n\nFor any engagement above commodity rates, you need a value story. Clients buy outcomes, not inputs.\n\n**Value quantification framework:**\n\n| Value Driver | How to Measure | Example |\n|---|---|---|\n| Cost reduction | Current cost minus future cost | Process improvement saves $2M/year in labor |\n| Revenue increase | Incremental revenue attributable to engagement | Pricing optimization adds $5M in annual revenue |\n| Risk reduction | Expected loss avoided or probability reduced | Compliance program reduces expected regulatory fines |\n| Speed to market | Value of time saved | Launching 3 months earlier captures $3M in first-mover revenue |\n| Capability building | Cost of alternative capability development | Building internal team would cost $4M and take 18 months |\n\n**Value-sharing models:**\n\n| Approach | Structure | When It Works |\n|---|---|---|\n| Percentage of value | Fee = X% of quantified benefit | Value is large, measurable, and clearly attributable |\n| Tiered sharing | Lower % on first tranche, higher on upside | Aligns incentives as value grows |\n| Base + bonus | Fixed base fee plus bonus for exceeding targets | Client wants cost certainty with performance alignment |\n| Gainsharing | Fee funded from realized savings | Cost reduction engagements with measurable baseline |\n\n**ROI presentation:**\n\nPresent the client's investment case clearly:\n- Their investment (your fee)\n- Expected return (quantified benefits)\n- ROI ratio (benefits / fee)\n- Payback period (when benefits exceed fees)\n- Confidence level (how certain are the estimates)\n\n---\n\n## Retainer Structures\n\nRetainers deserve specific attention because they're the most relationship-dependent model.\n\n**Retainer design:**\n\n| Element | What to Define |\n|---|---|\n| Monthly fee | Fixed amount, usually based on expected hours x blended rate |\n| Hours included | Specify a range or minimum/maximum |\n| Rollover policy | Do unused hours carry forward? (Usually no, or capped) |\n| Overage rate | Rate for hours beyond the included amount |\n| Scope boundaries | What's in-scope vs. what triggers a separate engagement |\n| Review period | When to reassess the retainer level (quarterly is typical) |\n| Termination notice | Usually 30-60 days |\n\n**Tier structures:**\n\n| Tier | Positioning | Typical Includes |\n|---|---|---|\n| Advisory | Senior access, strategic guidance | Partner/principal hours, limited deliverables |\n| Standard | Ongoing project support | Mixed team, regular deliverables, monthly check-ins |\n| Embedded | Team augmentation, continuous delivery | Dedicated resources, sprint-based delivery, daily interaction |\n\n---\n\n## Key Principles\n\n- Price for value, not for cost. Your cost structure informs your floor, not your ceiling.\n- Protect your rate card. Discount the deal, not the rates. Once rates drop, they rarely recover.\n- Understand the client's buying process. Know who approves, what budget exists, what alternatives they're considering, and what procurement will challenge.\n- Every pricing decision is a margin decision. Model the economics before you quote.\n- Document all assumptions. Pricing disputes almost always trace back to unstated assumptions about scope, effort, or deliverables.\n- Build in scope change mechanisms. Fixed-fee engagements without change order processes are blank checks.\n- Know your walk-away point. Not every engagement is worth winning. Unprofitable work is worse than no work.\n- Align payment timing with cost timing. Don't finance the engagement for the client.\n- The best pricing strategy is one the client feels good about. If they feel squeezed, the relationship suffers even if you win the deal.\n- Retainers only work with trust. Don't propose retainers to new clients who haven't seen your work yet.","tags":["engagement","pricing","management","consulting","plugin","anotb","agent-skills","anthropic","claude","codex","cowork","gemini-cli"],"capabilities":["skill","source-anotb","skill-engagement-pricing","topic-agent-skills","topic-anthropic","topic-claude","topic-codex","topic-consulting","topic-cowork","topic-gemini-cli","topic-management-consulting","topic-plugin"],"categories":["management-consulting-plugin"],"synonyms":[],"warnings":[],"endpointUrl":"https://skills.sh/anotb/management-consulting-plugin/engagement-pricing","protocol":"skill","transport":"skills-sh","auth":{"type":"none","details":{"cli":"npx skills add anotb/management-consulting-plugin","source_repo":"https://github.com/anotb/management-consulting-plugin","install_from":"skills.sh"}},"qualityScore":"0.461","qualityRationale":"deterministic score 0.46 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 22 github stars · SKILL.md body (14,714 chars)","verified":false,"liveness":"unknown","lastLivenessCheck":null,"agentReviews":{"count":0,"score_avg":null,"cost_usd_avg":null,"success_rate":null,"latency_p50_ms":null,"narrative_summary":null,"summary_updated_at":null},"enrichmentModel":"deterministic:skill-github:v1","enrichmentVersion":1,"enrichedAt":"2026-04-23T13:02:39.383Z","embedding":null,"createdAt":"2026-04-18T23:05:46.269Z","updatedAt":"2026-04-23T13:02:39.383Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-04-23T13:02:39.383Z","tsv":"'-10':804,1310,1336 '-15':814,1301,1326 '-2':1070,1174 '-20':1350 '-30':795,1056 '-40':1063,1073 '-5':1322 '-60':1835 '-65':919 '1':75,672,673,684,694,705,706,714,715,716,1069,1173 '10':1325,1349 '15':794 '18':1644 '2':450,674,685,1321 '20':1055 '2m/year':1580 '3':695,707,724,1619 '30':1062,1072,1110,1184,1834 '3m':1623 '4':686,939 '40':910,1082 '4m':1641 '5':803,813,1270,1300,1309,1335 '50':918 '5m':1593 '6':696,1540 '60':1115 '70':929 'abil':1403 'absorb':1123 'accept':986,1077,1088,1093,1180,1376,1537 'access':266,1845 'account':174,276,579 'achiev':316,1013 'across':890,1068 'actual':859,873,886 'add':1592 'addit':1519 'adjust':1422 'advisori':143,150,270,712,1843 'affili':1258 'agre':214,234 'align':356,1679,1700,1997 'alloc':793,848 'almost':1950 'alongsid':1470 'altern':621,1347,1633,1923 'alway':1951 'amount':1771,1806 'analysi':522,820,1045,1493 'analyst':545 'analyst/consultant':647 'analyt':531,540,711 'analyz':36 'anchor':1465 'annual':1595 'appli':1533 'approach':1650 'approv':1131,1918 'assess':76,108 'assumpt':1500,1947,1956 'assur':494 'attent':1752 'attribut':302,1587,1669 'augment':224,1866 'avail':268 'avoid':1601 'away':1365,1982 'back':1112,1393,1953 'balanc':58 'base':22,26,190,194,283,312,337,418,422,978,1024,1503,1684,1687,1773,1873 'baselin':1712 'benchmark':561 'benefit':753,1331,1662,1729,1732,1737 'best':203,2012 'beyond':1803 'bill':211,756 'blank':1976 'blend':1778 'bonus':341,370,1685,1690 'boundari':1808 'budget':1920 'build':27,728,1541,1630,1636,1962 'built':1265 'busi':800 'buy':1382,1557,1914 'calcul':1370 'cap':366,1132,1172,1797 'capabl':1629,1634 'captur':874,1622 'card':29,49,474,863,870,1415,1437,1897 'carri':1792 'case':1398,1504,1544,1720 'categori':741,788 'ceil':1893 'certain':1743 'certainti':586,818,1697 'challeng':1931 'chang':1204,1206,1965,1972 'characterist':78 'charg':564 'check':1862,1977 'check-in':1861 'claim':301 'clarifi':1261 'clariti':113 'clear':117,241,295,319,1668,1721 'client':68,168,231,261,289,328,342,472,489,505,535,619,654,990,1091,1140,1144,1147,1249,1316,1344,1445,1556,1694,1717,1912,2010,2018,2046 'client-specif':1146 'combin':359 'command':573 'commerci':9,53,941,943,1100 'commit':582,1307,1395 'commod':1549 'compar':566 'comparison':1490 'competit':65,614,1334,1530 'competitor':563 'complet':1190 'complex':371 'complianc':1605 'complic':1511 'compon':378 'composit':626,1424 'concern':653 'concret':246 'confid':1740 'confidenti':1165 'consid':415,1926 'consider':1223 'consult':5,56,228,256,306,525,537,668,924 'contenti':1170 'conting':812 'continu':1867 'contract':949,1058 'contribut':843,853 'control':325 'convers':1463 'core':530 'cost':634,730,740,748,771,781,785,799,802,806,831,838,849,1033,1038,1120,1128,1458,1570,1573,1576,1631,1640,1696,1707,1884,1886,2001 'cover':835 'creat':412,444 'credibl':300,1346 'creep':258,1219 'current':1572 'cut':1412 'daili':478,876,1875 'data':548,773 'day':516,518,881,889,1185,1327,1836 'day-to-day':515 'deal':491,1900,2034 'decid':96 'decis':1934,1938 'dedic':1869 'defin':114,237,375,387,594,1246,1507,1767 'delay':1092 'deliv':288,1375 'deliver':141,146,244,533,543,783,985,1076,1252,1851,1859,1961 'deliveri':70,519,1868,1874 'depend':83,815,1760 'deriv':1259 'deserv':1750 'design':1016,1763 'determin':554 'devalu':1416 'develop':4,451,475,801,1635 'dilig':704 'direct':557,739,797,830,837 'director':498 'discount':39,584,1271,1287,1294,1389,1406,1433,1532,1898 'discoveri':221 'disput':1949 'document':1945 'done':249 'downsid':1527 'draft':544 'drive':104,482,632 'driven':722 'driver':1565 'drop':1906 'due':703 'durat':129 'e.g':361 'earli':1039,1319 'earlier':1621 'earn':583,887 'econom':32,51,727,1941 'economi':1482 'effect':875 'effort':1959 'element':1764 'embed':1864 'enabl':119,187 'engag':2,12,31,43,50,57,77,86,101,134,372,662,664,726,834,852,937,958,973,981,993,1025,1098,1225,1276,1303,1352,1547,1589,1709,1819,1970,1986,2007 'engagement-pr':1 'enter':1284 'entri':546 'especi':424 'essenti':1211 'estim':1746 'even':463,2029 'everi':460,1275,1932,1985 'evolv':116,220 'exampl':1569 'exceed':1692,1738 'execut':691,698 'execution-heavi':690 'execution-intens':697 'exist':171,321,1921 'expand':1404,1518 'expans':1357 'expect':1599,1608,1726,1775 'expens':1124,1133 'experi':495 'expertis':572 'factor':102,107,555,556 'faster':1396 'favor':135 'fee':16,121,140,149,233,264,284,313,338,368,396,432,645,650,828,845,860,879,980,1020,1085,1137,1177,1197,1201,1215,1373,1449,1501,1513,1524,1535,1658,1688,1702,1725,1733,1739,1769,1969 'feel':2019,2024 'final':1075,1087 'financ':1096,1119,1330,2005 'fine':1610 'firm':60,791,855,897,925,1151 'first':1351,1440,1626,1674 'first-mov':1625 'fix':17,120,139,148,232,367,395,979,1019,1200,1214,1686,1770,1968 'fixed-fe':1018,1199,1213,1967 'flex':624 'flexibl':1161 'flight':759 'floor':1534,1890 'focus':719,1447 'forward':1793 'foundat':458 'framework':1563 'front':1027 'front-load':1026 'fulli':746 'fund':1703 'futur':1575 'fuzzi':115,122 'gainshar':1701 'game':347 'gather':549 'general':905 'genuin':1329 'get':950,1391 'good':2020 'gross':826,907,915,926 'ground':762 'grow':1683 'guid':906 'guidanc':1847 'haven':2048 'healthi':921 'heavi':681,692 'high':158,229,253,333,676 'high-judg':675 'higher':159,574,609,638,646,1473,1523,1525,1676 'higher-pr':1472 'hotel':760 'hour':1421,1776,1780,1791,1802,1849 'hours/days':212 'hybrid':358,442 'implement':144,693 'implic':111 'improv':683,1264,1578 'in':1863 'in-scop':1811 'incent':357,1680 'includ':744,1195,1781,1805,1842 'increas':1584 'increment':1585 'incur':1036 'indirect':784 'inform':1888 'input':1560 'insist':1141 'instead':1419 'intellectu':1142 'intens':699 'interact':536,1876 'interim':1065 'intern':1253,1637 'invest':177,1719,1723 'invoic':970 'involv':640,1226,1277 'ip':1220 'judgment':677 'junior':656,701 'justif':1298 'key':1877 'kickoff':1061 'kill':1196 'know':1361,1916,1978 'labor':1582 'larg':297,429,581,992,1305,1665 'launch':1618 'leadership':504 'lean':393,399 'level':155,476,1741,1827 'leverag':628,648,659 'liabil':1171,1182 'licens':772,1222,1232,1235 'limit':1850 'link':285 'll':411 'load':747,1028 'location/delivery':602 'logic':384 'logo':1318 'long':1312 'long-term':1311 'longer':133,1394 'look':1487 'lose':960 'loss':1600 'low':156,225,259,303 'lower':527,538,613,1672 'lower-mid':526 'lump':1431 'lump-sum':1430 'm':19,126,210,363,402,972 'manag':506,512,521,667 'manager/engagement':511 'margin':37,62,735,819,827,844,894,908,916,927,1377,1502,1515,1526,1538,1937 'market':559,900,1613 'marque':1317 'match':1031 'materi':208,778 'may':175,623,652,932 'meal':761 'measur':180,181,184,185,330,350,407,1568,1666,1711 'mechan':1966 'medium':157,277 'meet':948 'methodolog':1153,1160,1268 'metric':320,821 'mid':501,513,528 'middl':1485 'mileston':977,988,1023,1066,1071 'milestone-bas':976,1022 'minimum':1372,1536 'minimum/maximum':1786 'minus':829,846,1574 'mix':631,1856 'model':7,30,47,82,105,167,197,199,360,382,443,462,550,603,725,731,1000,1229,1494,1649,1761,1939 'money':961 'month':131,263,969,997,1620,1645,1768,1860 'mover':1627 'much':866 'multipl':1302 'mutual':1166 'narrow':1425,1529 'nda':1167 'need':124,274,1339,1552 'negoti':1105,1158,1273,1278,1359,1459 'net':1109,1114 'never':1078,1388 'new':170,989,2045 'non':1157 'non-negoti':1156 'note':1106 'notic':1186,1832 'offshor':612 'on-sit':605,765 'one':2016 'ongo':132,269,436,1853 'oper':682 'opportun':1358 'optim':1591 'option':198,964,1469,1476,1483,1486 'order':1207,1973 'origin':492 'outcom':25,179,186,193,290,311,327,421,1006,1558 'outcome-bas':24,192,310,420 'outcome-trigg':1005 'overag':1798 'overhead':754,787,792 'oversight':523 'own':1145,1263 'ownership':1243 'parti':770 'partial':182 'partner':666 'partner/director':485 'partner/principal':639,1848 'partnership':1314 'payback':1734 'payment':34,962,983,995,1009,1014,1029,1047,1107,1187,1320,1323,1397,1998 'peopl':1418 'per':888 'perceiv':636 'percentag':1655 'perform':340,1699 'period':1735,1821 'personnel':745,798 'phase':138,222,1520 'pilot/land-and-expand':1348 'plan':38 'plus':339,1689 'point':1366,1983 'polici':1125,1788 'poor':593 'posit':66,901,1104,1522,1840 'potenti':335 'pr':42 'pre':1130 'pre-approv':1129 'precis':390 'predict':272,975,1001 'prefer':89 'premium':162,496,569,591,601,1475,1521 'present':1466,1498,1714,1715 'pressur':599,615,710,1531 'price':3,6,44,46,72,81,94,99,110,178,195,196,235,423,461,738,947,957,1210,1353,1441,1474,1491,1590,1879,1933,1948,2013 'principal/associate':497 'principl':1360,1878 'print':779 'probabl':1603 'problem':509 'problem-solv':508 'process':73,687,1208,1577,1915,1974 'procur':1929 'product':534,780,1150,1164 'profil':206,1034 'profit':856 'program':1606 'project':1854 'properti':1143 'propos':2042 'proprietari':1227 'protect':1191,1216,1434,1894 'provid':1428 'push':1111 'put':1079 'qualiti':493 'quantif':1562 'quantifi':292,1661,1728 'quarter':1828 'quot':1944 'rais':644 'ramp':1042 'ramp-up':1041 'rang':109,480,488,502,514,529,539,547,790,1297,1784 'rare':1169,1908 'rate':28,48,215,453,455,473,479,484,553,560,575,622,757,858,862,869,877,1411,1414,1436,1550,1779,1799,1800,1896,1903,1905 'ratio':660,669,1731 'rational':558,670 're':93,872,885,1095,1122,1381,1455,1755,1925 'realiz':857,1705 'reason':1488 'reassess':1824 'recommend':1468 'recov':1909 'recur':273 'reduc':649,994,1420,1604,1607 'reduct':1571,1598,1708 'refer':1315,1402 'reference-':1401 'reflect':1050 'regular':1858 'regulatori':1609 'reimburs':1126 'relat':430 'relationship':169,271,351,437,490,721,1759,2027 'relationship-depend':1758 'relationship-driven':720 'relationship/strategic':1308 'relationship/volume':576 'remot':611 'requir':63 'research':542,552,1044 'resourc':702,1870 'result':318,348,1011 'retain':23,128,136,153,262,404,440,713,998,999,1152,1747,1749,1762,1826,2035,2043 'return':1727 'revenu':1583,1586,1596,1628 'review':1820 'right':80,1245,1400 'risk':154,160,165,205,226,254,304,332,355,380,590,811,996,1597 'risk-shar':164 'risk/reward':336 'roi':293,1713,1730 'rollov':1787 'room':840,1286 'salari':752 'save':1579,1617,1706 'scarc':571 'scenario':1496,1499 'schedul':1015,1048,1054 'scope':112,118,123,216,238,239,257,389,585,817,1203,1218,1306,1405,1426,1505,1517,1528,1807,1813,1958,1964 'second':1442 'seen':2050 'select':106,383 'senior':507,524,642,680,718,1844 'senior-focus':717 'senior-heavi':679 'sensit':1492 'separ':1818 'set':33 'share':166,331,354,381,1256,1648,1671 'show':468,1438 'side':280,448,1004 'sign':914 'signal':641 'signatur':1059 'signific':324 'similar':250 'site':607,767 'size':898 'skill' 'skill-engagement-pricing' 'skin':344 'softwar':777,1231 'solv':510 'someth':1392 'source-anotb' 'spare':842 'special':568 'specialist':774 'specif':317,1148,1751 'specifi':1782 'speed':1611 'spread':1067 'sprint':1872 'sprint-bas':1871 'squeez':2025 'stabil':445 'stabl':243 'staf':657 'staff':223 'standard':861,1099,1103,1168,1508,1852 'start':1369 'step':74,449,723,938,1269,1539 'still':959 'stori':1555 'straightforward':974 'strateg':172,173,275,578,1846 'strategi':10,40,671,1274,1281,2014 'strip':1480 'stripped-down':1479 'structur':15,45,308,454,940,963,965,1651,1748,1838,1887 'studi':1399 'subcontractor':775 'success':369 'sudden':1193 'suffer':2028 'suggest':930 'suit':152 'sum':1432 'support':147,352,541,551,1855 'tailor':379 'take':1643 'tangibl':142,145 'target':893,1512,1514,1693 'team':520,625,630,750,892,1040,1423,1509,1638,1857,1865 'tell':824 'term':35,54,942,944,1101,1102,1108,1313 'termin':1183,1194,1831 'third':769 'third-parti':768 'three':1495 'tie':314,982 'tier':1670,1837,1839 'time':207,709,751,1616,1999,2002 'time-pressur':708 'timelin':598 'tool':776,1155,1228,1237 'top':486 'topic-agent-skills' 'topic-anthropic' 'topic-claude' 'topic-codex' 'topic-consulting' 'topic-cowork' 'topic-gemini-cli' 'topic-management-consulting' 'topic-plugin' 'total':878,880,1176,1408 'toward':394,400 'trace':1952 'tranch':1675 'transfer':1234,1242 'transpar':353 'transport':763 'travel':758 'trigger':1007,1816 'trust':329,2039 'type':663,665,1288,1295 'typic':477,608,658,789,1053,1296,1830,1841 'uncertain':589 'undefin':218,377 'underinvest':934 'understand':90,733,1452,1910 'unlimit':1181 'unprofit':1990 'unstat':1955 'unus':1790 'upfront':987 'upper':500 'upper-mid':499 'upsid':334,1516,1678 'urgenc':596 'usag':1244 'use':13,968,1239,1251,1292,1464 'usual':1772,1794,1833 'valu':21,69,189,282,287,409,417,427,637,864,1439,1453,1462,1543,1554,1561,1564,1614,1647,1657,1663,1682,1881 'value-bas':20,188,281,416 'value-shar':1646 'value/outcome-based':1008 'vari':895 'variabl':604 've':248 'volum':1299 'vs':1233,1814 'walk':1364,1981 'walk-away':1363,1980 'want':343,1695 'warn':913 'warrant':161,176,600 'week':130 'well':309,956 'well-pric':955 'whether':832,850,1247 'win':808,1341,1355,1386,1989,2032 'within':1324 'without':1390,1971 'work':151,202,251,532,567,595,678,688,810,882,1149,1163,1189,1202,1260,1384,1654,1991,1996,2037,2052 'workstream':503 'wors':1993 'worth':1988 'would':1639 'written':1205 'wrong':952 'x':1175,1659,1777 'yes':392,414,439 'yet':2053","prices":[{"id":"dee5ce82-d9a4-4d4a-aba8-4de48c069fe3","listingId":"f19ce0ae-2f91-48d7-b0b0-8145dc2234f3","amountUsd":"0","unit":"free","nativeCurrency":null,"nativeAmount":null,"chain":null,"payTo":null,"paymentMethod":"skill-free","isPrimary":true,"details":{"org":"anotb","category":"management-consulting-plugin","install_from":"skills.sh"},"createdAt":"2026-04-18T23:05:46.269Z"}],"sources":[{"listingId":"f19ce0ae-2f91-48d7-b0b0-8145dc2234f3","source":"github","sourceId":"anotb/management-consulting-plugin/engagement-pricing","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/anotb/management-consulting-plugin/tree/main/skills/engagement-pricing","isPrimary":false,"firstSeenAt":"2026-04-18T23:05:46.269Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-04-23T13:02:39.383Z"}],"details":{"listingId":"f19ce0ae-2f91-48d7-b0b0-8145dc2234f3","quickStartSnippet":null,"exampleRequest":null,"exampleResponse":null,"schema":null,"openapiUrl":null,"agentsTxtUrl":null,"citations":[],"useCases":[],"bestFor":[],"notFor":[],"kindDetails":{"org":"anotb","slug":"engagement-pricing","github":{"repo":"anotb/management-consulting-plugin","stars":22,"topics":["agent-skills","anthropic","claude","codex","consulting","cowork","gemini-cli","management-consulting","plugin"],"license":"mit","html_url":"https://github.com/anotb/management-consulting-plugin","pushed_at":"2026-04-03T15:05:14Z","description":"Management consulting skills for Claude Code, Cowork, Codex, and other agents. Strategy, operations, and transformation workflows for the full engagement lifecycle.","skill_md_sha":"e6982d649c7de74e6f46f1b3a0f02ee89eceb588","skill_md_path":"skills/engagement-pricing/SKILL.md","default_branch":"main","skill_tree_url":"https://github.com/anotb/management-consulting-plugin/tree/main/skills/engagement-pricing"},"layout":"multi","source":"github","category":"management-consulting-plugin","frontmatter":{"name":"engagement-pricing","description":"Develop consulting pricing models and commercial strategy for engagements. Use when structuring fees (fixed, T&M, value-based, retainer, outcome-based), building rate cards, modeling engagement economics, setting payment terms, analyzing margins, planning discount strategy, or preparing commercial terms for proposals and SOWs."},"skills_sh_url":"https://skills.sh/anotb/management-consulting-plugin/engagement-pricing"},"updatedAt":"2026-04-23T13:02:39.383Z"}}