{"id":"9a5362f1-4130-4774-aa19-bd6454ca883a","shortId":"Mhq38g","kind":"skill","title":"academic-polishing","tagline":"Polish academic prose, de-AI-ify text, control claim strength, or rewrite method sections for CS/AI/ML papers. Executes Prose Quality Gate, Claim Strength Audit, and de-AI pass. Use when: removing AI writing patterns from paper text, adjusting claim strength to match evidence lev","description":"# Academic Polishing\n\n将此 skill 视为\"学术文体打磨代理\"——不是简单润色，而是执行 prose 质量闸门、去AI化改写、claim 强度控制和 Method 专项叙事强化。\n\n## Red Lines（绝对禁止）\n\n1. 禁止将编造内容包装成学术表述\n2. 禁止在无数据支撑时使用\"显著的\"\"重要的\"等空洞强化词\n3. 禁止把未核验的 user_claim 改写成确定性的强结论\n4. 禁止在 Method 中保留元评论、代码讲解或审稿人对话口吻\n5. 禁止用更华丽的措辞掩盖 evidence gap（如用长篇 prose 包装缺失的实验结果）\n6. 禁止把结构性缺口当作语言问题处理。若 section 缺少必要论证功能、reader-state 转换或 evidence hooks，必须标记 `section_contract_debt = open`，退回 `academic-paper-writer` 的 Section Contract / Blueprint，而不是继续润色。\n\n## AI 介入边界（Traffic Light）\n\n| 🟢 Green — 直接执行 | 🟡 Yellow — 谨慎执行 | 🔴 Red — 禁止 |\n|---------------------|---------------------|-------------|\n| 替换空洞形容词为具体描述 | 从代码/实现推断设计动机（必须降级语气） | 编造实验证据、虚构数值 |\n| 替换 AI 典型连接词 | 补全方法细节描述（必须标注推断来源） | 生成假引用或假数据 |\n| 调整句式衔接和逻辑连接 | 扩写 Discussion 中的领域解释（必须有文献） | 把 user_claim 改写成强结论 |\n| 改写语法错误和不自然表述 | 降级不匹配的 claim 强度 | 删除占位符但不补内容 |\n| 将提纲句改写为完整段落 | 将弱推断改写成确定性作者意图 | 在无证据时添加\"显著提升\"类表述 |\n\n## 非协商规则\n\n1. 正文必须读起来像经验丰富的人类学者撰写，不得有模板驱动的机器输出痕迹。\n2. 句子之间必须建立因果、递进、转折或并列补足的深层逻辑，不得只靠连接词维持表面连贯。\n3. 正文不得残留元评论口吻、审稿人对话口吻、代码讲解口吻或 checklist 痕迹。\n4. Claim 强度必须与证据等级严格匹配：强结论需有本地可复核结果 + 无协议缺陷。\n5. Method 相关 section 必须形成\"问题 → 设计 → 机制 → 收益/边界\"叙事，不得停留于公式罗列。\n6. 当输入中包含 `evidence_debt = open` 时，对标记为证据不足的句子仅修正语法错误，不得进行风格强化或措辞润色——避免将无证据支撑的主张打磨得更有说服力。\n7. 当输入中包含 `section_contract_debt = open` 或明显缺少 section-level required moves 时，仅输出问题定位和最小语言修正；不得代替 `academic-paper-writer` 重新设计整节结构。\n\n## 任务模式\n\n1. **prose-quality-gate** — 执行通用 prose 质量检查与改写\n2. **method-prose-rewrite** — Method 专项正文化（问题→设计→机制→收益/边界）\n3. **de-ai-pass** — 仅执行去AI化改写\n4. **claim-strength-audit** — 审计并调整 claims 强度\n\n## 工作流\n\n### Step 1: 确认当前 section 类型与改写目标\n\n明确是 Introduction / Related Work / Method / Experiments / Discussion / Conclusion。不同 section 有不同的 prose 检查重点。\n\n### Step 2: 执行通用 Prose Quality Gate\n\n**通用检查项：**\n- 正文是否仍以提纲句、说明句为主，而非完整 prose 段落\n- 是否存在元评论口吻、审稿人对话口吻或代码讲解口吻\n- 是否符合去AI化规范（详见 `references/de-ai-patterns.md`）\n\n**章节专项检查项：**\n- Introduction / Related Work：是否只有列举，缺少论证链、综合比较或 work-cluster 叙事\n- Method：是否仍停留在公式罗列或模块说明，缺少\"问题 → 设计 → 机制 → 收益/边界\"叙事\n- Experimental Setup / Data：是否只有参数或流程罗列，缺少协议、约束与风险说明\n- Discussion / Limitations / Conclusion：是否只有泛泛结论，缺少边界分析、失败模式或限制讨论\n\n输出：`prose_debt: open|closed`、`failed_items: [list]`\n\n若发现问题属于 section-level 结构债务（例如 Introduction 未建立 gap cost、Related Work 无 work clusters、Results 无主问题、Discussion 无边界分析），同时输出 `section_contract_debt: open` 并建议回到 `academic-paper-writer/references/section-writing-contracts.md` 重建 Section Contract。\n\n### Step 3: Prose Rewrite（若 prose_debt 为 open）\n\n- 将提纲式句子改为完整论证段落\n- 将元评论、说明文和代码导览口吻改写为学术 prose\n- 将罗列式段落改为具有论证链和段内逻辑衔接的连贯段落\n- 执行去AI化改写（参考 `references/de-ai-patterns.md`）\n- 若 `section_contract_debt = open`，只做局部可安全改写；不得补写整节缺失的 required moves，避免把结构债务伪装成流畅 prose。\n\nProse Quality Gate + Rewrite 循环最多 2 轮。2 轮后仍未通过，保留 prose_debt: open，允许继续后续步骤但最终 Verification 不得判为 passed。\n\n### Step 4: Method Prose Rewrite（若当前为 Method section）\n\n详见 `references/method-narrative.md`。\n\n重点检查：\n- 是否仍存在公式罗列而缺少\"问题 → 设计 → 机制 → 收益/边界\"叙事\n- 模块段首是否直接落在\"该模块解决什么问题\"\n- 是否仍残留\"从实现看\"\"一个合理解释是\"\"当前代码表明\"等推断降级不充分的口吻\n\n正文中优先使用以下开头方式：\n- \"为缓解……问题，本文……\"\n- \"考虑到……，本文采用……\"\n- \"与……相比，该设计……\"\n- \"为使……能够……，我们进一步……\"\n\n### Step 5: Claim Strength Audit（强制，非可选）\n\n详见 `references/claim-strength.md`。\n\n**零容忍触发词规则**：以下词汇在正文中出现时，必须立即检查是否满足 Strong 条件。若不满足，**强制降级**，不得保留原表述：\n\n| 触发词 | 必须附带的证据 | 不满足时的降级 |\n|--------|--------------|--------------|\n| \"显著(地)\" / \"significantly\" | p 值 < 0.05 或效应量 / 置信区间 | 删除或改为具体数值差异 |\n| \"稳定(的)\" / \"robust\" / \"stable\" | 多随机种子 / 交叉验证 / 外部测试集 | 改为\"在观察到的...中一致\" |\n| \"作为\" / \"acts as\" / \"serves as\" | 因果干预实验或领域共识文献 | 改为\"可能作为...候选\" |\n| \"表明\" / \"demonstrates\" | Strong 条件全部满足 | 改为\"提示\" / \"与...一致\" |\n| \"泛化\" / \"generalization\" | 独立测试集或多数据集验证 | 改为\"在...数据集上\" |\n| \"SOTA\" / \"state-of-the-art\" | 完整基线对比 + 独立测试集 | 改为\"与当前比较范围相比...\" |\n\n| 强度 | 条件 | 典型表达 |\n|------|------|---------|\n| Strong | 本地可复核 + 无协议缺陷 | show, demonstrate, outperform |\n| Medium | 内部验证 / baseline 不全 | suggest, indicate, appears to improve |\n| Weak | 仅 user_claim / 无法复核 | may, could, requires further validation |\n\n必须主动降级不匹配的 claims。把内部验证包装成外部泛化 → 必须降级。把缺失 baseline 的结果写成 SOTA → 必须降级。\n\n### Step 6: 输出\n\n```md\n## Prose Quality Gate Result\n- prose_debt: open|closed\n- section_contract_debt: open|closed\n- failed_items: [...]\n- method_prose_debt: open|closed (if applicable)\n\n## Rewritten Text\n（改写后的正文段落）\n\n## Claim Strength Changes\n- Original: \"X outperforms Y\" → Revised: \"X appears to improve over Y on internal validation\"\n- ...\n```\n\n## Agent 资源与调用方式\n\n### 调用方式\n\n本 Skill 由 `academic-paper-writer` 编排器在 Step 6.6 内化调用。主 Agent 读取本 SKILL.md 及 references/ 下的规则文件后自行执行润色与 claim 强度审计，不 dispatch 独立子 Agent。这确保叙事风格与全文一致，避免上下文传递损失。\n\n## 独立使用\n\n当本 Skill 被独立加载（不通过 `academic-paper-writer` 编排器）时：\n\n### 典型请求\n- \"润色一下这段 Method\"\n- \"去掉 AI 味，不要像 ChatGPT 写的\"\n- \"检查一下 claim 有没有过度断言\"\n- \"帮我把结果部分改得更学术\"\n\n### 入口分流\n\n| 用户请求特征 | 匹配模式 | 优先级 | 行为 |\n|------------|---------|--------|------|\n| \"润色一下\"、\"改改语言\" | prose-quality-gate | 2（模糊匹配） | 通用 Prose Quality Gate 检查 + 改写，最多 2 轮 |\n| \"去掉 AI 味\"、\"不像人类写的\" | de-ai-pass | 2（模糊匹配） | 仅去 AI 化改写（AI 连接词、句式调整） |\n| \"claim 太强了\"、\"降级结论\" | claim-strength-audit | 2（模糊匹配） | 审计所有 claim 强度，零容忍词检查 |\n| \"改写 Method\"、\"Method 写得太潦草\" | method-prose-rewrite | 2（模糊匹配） | Method 专项叙事：问题→设计→机制→收益/边界 |\n| 指定具体模式名称 | 按指定 | 1（用户显式指定） | 忽略自动推断，按指定模式执行 |\n\n### 执行约束\n- **此 Skill 只修改论文草稿文本，绝对不得修改项目源代码、配置文件或数据文件**\n- **不得独立撰写整节论文**\n- 最多 2 轮改写轮次，第 2 轮后无论结果如何均交付\n- 输出格式与编排器调度一致：Prose Quality Gate Result + Rewritten Text + Claim Strength Changes\n\n### 组合使用指引\n| 场景 | 推荐方式 |\n|------|---------|\n| 只需润色/去 AI 化 | 本 Skill（独立） |\n| 起草过程中自动润色 | academic-paper-writer 编排器（Step 6.6 内化调用） |\n| 审修后需润色 | academic-reviser → 本 Skill |\n\n## 何时读取 references/\n\n| Reference 文件 | 打开条件 |\n|---------------|---------|\n| `references/de-ai-patterns.md` | 执行去AI化改写、Prose Quality Gate 通用检查时 |\n| `references/claim-strength.md` | 执行 Claim Strength Audit、overclaim 检查或学术风格检查时 |\n| `references/method-narrative.md` | 当前为 Method section、执行 Method Prose Rewrite 时 |\n| `references/section-moves.md` | 需要按节类型获取 move order、phrase families 或过渡表达参考时 |\n| `references/phrasebank-playbook.md` | 需要证据强度用词替换、过渡词族、gap/limitation/implication 短语参考时 |\n\n## 不适用场景\n\n本 Skill 不适用于：\n- 非学术文体的通用文本润色\n- 已有明确 LaTeX 格式且不需内容修改的场景\n- 内容补全（如补实验数据、补引用）——应使用 `academic-experiments` 或 `academic-citation`\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n| 模式 | 问题 | 正确做法 |\n|------|------|---------|\n| 表面润色 | 只改措辞不改 evidence gap | claim 强度必须与证据匹配，无证据时保留占位符 |\n| AI 典型用词 | \"delve into\"、\"crucial\"、\"notably\" 过度使用 | 使用领域特定词汇，替换空洞修饰词 |\n| 方法缩写 | Method 只写概述不写核心细节 | 核心模块需展开：瓶颈→设计选择→机制→公式→收益→代价 |\n| 强词夺理 | 无数据时仍用\"显著提升\"等强表述 | 降级语气，用保守表述或占位符 |","tags":["academic","polishing","paper","writer","joshua-zyy","academic-writing","agent-skills","anthropic-skills","paper-writing","skills"],"capabilities":["skill","source-joshua-zyy","skill-academic-polishing","topic-academic-writing","topic-agent-skills","topic-anthropic-skills","topic-paper-writing","topic-skills"],"categories":["academic-paper-writer"],"synonyms":[],"warnings":[],"endpointUrl":"https://skills.sh/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer/academic-polishing","protocol":"skill","transport":"skills-sh","auth":{"type":"none","details":{"cli":"npx skills add joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer","source_repo":"https://github.com/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer","install_from":"skills.sh"}},"qualityScore":"0.453","qualityRationale":"deterministic score 0.45 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 7 github stars · SKILL.md body (6,406 chars)","verified":false,"liveness":"unknown","lastLivenessCheck":null,"agentReviews":{"count":0,"score_avg":null,"cost_usd_avg":null,"success_rate":null,"latency_p50_ms":null,"narrative_summary":null,"summary_updated_at":null},"enrichmentModel":"deterministic:skill-github:v1","enrichmentVersion":1,"enrichedAt":"2026-05-18T19:14:18.883Z","embedding":null,"createdAt":"2026-05-18T13:21:57.726Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-18T19:14:18.883Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-18T19:14:18.883Z","tsv":"'/references/section-writing-contracts.md':360 '0.05':471 '1':68,160,221,257,724 '2':70,163,229,275,397,399,665,674,684,699,713,736,739 '3':75,168,241,365 '4':80,174,247,410 '5':85,179,447 '6':92,191,556 '6.6':613,768 '7':200 'academ':2,5,50,110,216,357,608,636,763,772,828,832 'academic-cit':831 'academic-experi':827 'academic-paper-writ':109,215,356,607,635,762 'academic-polish':1 'academic-revis':771 'act':486 'adjust':43 'agent':601,616,627 'ai':9,32,37,118,135,244,645,677,682,687,689,756,847 'anti':835 'anti-pattern':834 'appear':533,593 'applic':580 'art':513 'audit':28,251,450,698,791 'baselin':529,551 'blueprint':116 'chang':586,750 'chatgpt':648 'checklist':172 'citat':833 'claim':13,26,44,61,78,147,151,175,249,253,448,539,547,584,622,651,692,696,702,748,789,844 'claim-strength-audit':248,695 'close':327,566,571,578 'cluster':300,345 'conclus':268,319 'contract':105,115,203,352,363,383,568 'control':12 'cost':340 'could':542 'crucial':851 'cs/ai/ml':20 'data':313 'de':8,31,243,681 'de-ai':30 'de-ai-ifi':7 'de-ai-pass':242,680 'debt':106,194,204,325,353,370,384,403,564,569,576 'delv':849 'demonstr':495,525 'discuss':142,267,317,348 'dispatch':625 'evid':48,87,101,193,842 'execut':22 'experi':266,829 'experiment':311 'fail':328,572 'famili':808 'gap':88,339,843 'gap/limitation/implication':813 'gate':25,225,279,394,561,664,670,744,785 'general':503 'green':122 'hook':102 'ifi':10 'improv':535,595 'indic':532 'intern':599 'introduct':262,292,337 'item':329,573 'latex':821 'lev':49 'level':209,334 'light':121 'limit':318 'line':66 'list':330 'match':47 'may':541 'md':558 'medium':527 'method':17,63,82,180,231,234,265,302,411,415,574,643,706,707,710,715,796,799,857 'method-prose-rewrit':230,709 'move':211,389,805 'notabl':852 'open':107,195,205,326,354,372,385,404,565,570,577 'order':806 'origin':587 'outperform':526,589 'overclaim':792 'p':469 'paper':21,41,111,217,358,609,637,764 'pass':33,245,408,683 'pattern':39,836 'phrase':807 'polish':3,4,51 'prose':6,23,58,90,223,227,232,272,277,284,324,366,369,376,391,392,402,412,559,563,575,662,668,711,742,783,800 'prose-quality-g':222,661 'qualiti':24,224,278,393,560,663,669,743,784 'reader':98 'reader-st':97 'red':65,126 'refer':620,777,778 'references/claim-strength.md':454,787 'references/de-ai-patterns.md':290,380,781 'references/method-narrative.md':418,794 'references/phrasebank-playbook.md':810 'references/section-moves.md':803 'relat':263,293,341 'remov':36 'requir':210,388,543 'result':346,562,745 'revis':591,773 'rewrit':16,233,367,395,413,712,801 'rewritten':581,746 'robust':477 'section':18,95,104,114,182,202,208,259,270,333,351,362,382,416,567,797 'section-level':207,332 'serv':488 'setup':312 'show':524 'signific':468 'skill':53,605,632,730,759,775,817 'skill-academic-polishing' 'skill.md':618 'sota':508,553 'source-joshua-zyy' 'stabl':478 'state':99,510 'state-of-the-art':509 'step':256,274,364,409,446,555,612,767 'strength':14,27,45,250,449,585,697,749,790 'strong':458,496,521 'suggest':531 'text':11,42,582,747 'topic-academic-writing' 'topic-agent-skills' 'topic-anthropic-skills' 'topic-paper-writing' 'topic-skills' 'traffic':120 'use':34 'user':77,146,538 'valid':545,600 'verif':406 'weak':536 'work':264,294,299,342,344 'work-clust':298 'write':38 'writer':112,218,359,610,638,765 'x':588,592 'y':590,597 'yellow':124 '一个合理解释是':431 '一致':501 '下的规则文件后自行执行润色与':621 '不':624 '不像人类写的':679 '不全':530 '不同':269 '不得代替':214 '不得保留原表述':462 '不得停留于公式罗列':190 '不得判为':407 '不得只靠连接词维持表面连贯':167 '不得有模板驱动的机器输出痕迹':162 '不得独立撰写整节论文':734 '不得补写整节缺失的':387 '不得进行风格强化或措辞润色':198 '不是简单润色':56 '不满足时的降级':465 '不要像':647 '不适用于':818 '不适用场景':815 '不通过':634 '与':440,500 '与当前比较范围相比':517 '专项叙事':716 '专项叙事强化':64 '专项正文化':235 '中一致':484 '中保留元评论':83 '中的领域解释':143 '为':371 '为使':443 '为缓解':435 '主':615 '交叉验证':480 '仅':537 '仅去':686 '仅执行去ai化改写':246 '仅输出问题定位和最小语言修正':213 '介入边界':119 '从代码':129 '从实现看':430 '代价':865 '代码讲解口吻或':171 '代码讲解或审稿人对话口吻':84 '以下词汇在正文中出现时':456 '任务模式':220 '优先级':657 '何时读取':776 '作为':485 '使用领域特定词汇':854 '例如':336 '保留':401 '候选':493 '值':470 '允许继续后续步骤但最终':405 '入口分流':654 '公式':863 '典型用词':848 '典型表达':520 '典型请求':641 '典型连接词':136 '内化调用':614,769 '内容补全':823 '内部验证':528 '写得太潦草':708 '写的':649 '删除占位符但不补内容':153 '删除或改为具体数值差异':474 '包装缺失的实验结果':91 '化':757 '化改写':688 '匹配模式':656 '去':755 '去ai化改写':60 '去掉':644,676 '参考':379 '及':619 '叙事':189,301,310,426 '句子之间必须建立因果':164 '句式调整':691 '只修改论文草稿文本':731 '只做局部可安全改写':386 '只写概述不写核心细节':858 '只改措辞不改':841 '只需润色':754 '可能作为':492 '同时输出':350 '味':646,678 '因果干预实验或领域共识文献':490 '在':506 '在无证据时添加':156 '在观察到的':483 '地':467 '场景':752 '外部测试集':481 '多随机种子':479 '太强了':693 '失败模式或限制讨论':322 '如用长篇':89 '如补实验数据':824 '学术文体打磨代理':55 '完整基线对比':514 '实现推断设计动机':130 '审修后需润色':770 '审稿人对话口吻':170 '审稿人对话口吻或代码讲解口吻':287 '审计并调整':252 '审计所有':701 '对标记为证据不足的句子仅修正语法错误':197 '将元评论':374 '将弱推断改写成确定性作者意图':155 '将提纲句改写为完整段落':154 '将提纲式句子改为完整论证段落':373 '将此':52 '将罗列式段落改为具有论证链和段内逻辑衔接的连贯段落':377 '工作流':255 '已有明确':820 '帮我把结果部分改得更学术':653 '并建议回到':355 '应使用':826 '强制':451 '强制降级':461 '强度':152,254,518,703 '强度审计':623 '强度必须与证据匹配':845 '强度必须与证据等级严格匹配':176 '强度控制和':62 '强结论需有本地可复核结果':177 '强词夺理':866 '当前为':795 '当前代码表明':432 '当本':631 '当输入中包含':192,201 '循环最多':396 '必须主动降级不匹配的':546 '必须形成':183 '必须有文献':144 '必须标注推断来源':138 '必须标记':103 '必须立即检查是否满足':457 '必须附带的证据':464 '必须降级':549,554 '必须降级语气':131 '忽略自动推断':726 '我们进一步':445 '或':830 '或效应量':472 '或明显缺少':206 '或过渡表达参考时':809 '打开条件':780 '执行':788,798 '执行去ai化改写':378,782 '执行约束':728 '执行通用':226,276 '扩写':141 '把':145 '把内部验证包装成外部泛化':548 '把缺失':550 '指定具体模式名称':722 '按指定':723 '按指定模式执行':727 '推荐方式':753 '提示':499 '收益':187,239,308,424,720,864 '改为':482,491,498,505,516 '改写':672,705 '改写后的正文段落':583 '改写成强结论':148 '改写成确定性的强结论':79 '改写语法错误和不自然表述':149 '改改语言':660 '数据集上':507 '文件':779 '方法缩写':856 '无':343 '无主问题':347 '无协议缺陷':178,523 '无数据时仍用':867 '无法复核':540 '无证据时保留占位符':846 '无边界分析':349 '时':196,212,640,802 '明确是':261 '是否仍停留在公式罗列或模块说明':303 '是否仍存在公式罗列而缺少':420 '是否仍残留':429 '是否只有列举':295 '是否只有参数或流程罗列':314 '是否只有泛泛结论':320 '是否存在元评论口吻':286 '是否符合去ai化规范':288 '显著':466 '显著提升':157,868 '显著的':72 '替换':134 '替换空洞修饰词':855 '替换空洞形容词为具体描述':128 '最多':673,735 '有不同的':271 '有没有过度断言':652 '未建立':338 '本':604,758,774,816 '本地可复核':522 '本文':437 '本文采用':439 '机制':186,238,307,423,719,862 '条件':459,519 '条件全部满足':497 '核心模块需展开':859 '格式且不需内容修改的场景':822 '检查':671 '检查一下':650 '检查或学术风格检查时':793 '检查重点':273 '模块段首是否直接落在':427 '模式':837 '模糊匹配':666,685,700,714 '正文不得残留元评论口吻':169 '正文中优先使用以下开头方式':434 '正文必须读起来像经验丰富的人类学者撰写':161 '正文是否仍以提纲句':281 '正确做法':839 '此':729 '段落':285 '泛化':502 '润色一下':659 '润色一下这段':642 '独立':760 '独立使用':630 '独立子':626 '独立测试集':515 '独立测试集或多数据集验证':504 '瓶颈':860 '生成假引用或假数据':139 '用保守表述或占位符':871 '用户显式指定':725 '用户请求特征':655 '由':606 '痕迹':173 '的':113,476 '的结果写成':552 '直接执行':123 '相关':181 '相比':441 '短语参考时':814 '确认当前':258 '禁止':127 '禁止在':81 '禁止在无数据支撑时使用':71 '禁止将编造内容包装成学术表述':69 '禁止把未核验的':76 '禁止把结构性缺口当作语言问题处理':93 '禁止用更华丽的措辞掩盖':86 '稳定':475 '章节专项检查项':291 '第':738 '等强表述':869 '等推断降级不充分的口吻':433 '等空洞强化词':74 '类型与改写目标':260 '类表述':158 '约束与风险说明':316 '组合使用指引':751 '结构债务':335 '绝对不得修改项目源代码':732 '绝对禁止':67 '综合比较或':297 '编排器':639,766 '编排器在':611 '编造实验证据':132 '缺少':304 '缺少协议':315 '缺少必要论证功能':96 '缺少论证链':296 '缺少边界分析':321 '置信区间':473 '考虑到':438 '而不是继续润色':117 '而是执行':57 '而非完整':283 '能够':444 '若':94,368,381 '若不满足':460 '若发现问题属于':331 '若当前为':414 '虚构数值':133 '行为':658 '补全方法细节描述':137 '补引用':825 '表明':494 '表面润色':840 '被独立加载':633 '视为':54 '触发词':463 '设计':185,237,306,422,718 '设计选择':861 '该模块解决什么问题':428 '该设计':442 '详见':289,417,453 '说明句为主':282 '说明文和代码导览口吻改写为学术':375 '读取本':617 '调整句式衔接和逻辑连接':140 '调用方式':603 '谨慎执行':125 '质量检查与改写':228 '质量闸门':59 '资源与调用方式':602 '起草过程中自动润色':761 '转折或并列补足的深层逻辑':166 '转换或':100 '轮':398,675 '轮后仍未通过':400 '轮后无论结果如何均交付':740 '轮改写轮次':737 '输出':323,557 '输出格式与编排器调度一致':741 '边界':188,240,309,425,721 '过度使用':853 '过渡词族':812 '这确保叙事风格与全文一致':628 '连接词':690 '退回':108 '递进':165 '通用':667 '通用检查时':786 '通用检查项':280 '避免上下文传递损失':629 '避免将无证据支撑的主张打磨得更有说服力':199 '避免把结构债务伪装成流畅':390 '配置文件或数据文件':733 '重建':361 '重新设计整节结构':219 '重点检查':419 '重要的':73 '问题':184,236,305,421,436,717,838 '降级不匹配的':150 '降级结论':694 '降级语气':870 '零容忍触发词规则':455 '零容忍词检查':704 '需要按节类型获取':804 '需要证据强度用词替换':811 '非协商规则':159 '非可选':452 '非学术文体的通用文本润色':819","prices":[{"id":"6bc36c31-792b-4cb8-838c-0c14f9c0dfab","listingId":"9a5362f1-4130-4774-aa19-bd6454ca883a","amountUsd":"0","unit":"free","nativeCurrency":null,"nativeAmount":null,"chain":null,"payTo":null,"paymentMethod":"skill-free","isPrimary":true,"details":{"org":"joshua-zyy","category":"academic-paper-writer","install_from":"skills.sh"},"createdAt":"2026-05-18T13:21:57.726Z"}],"sources":[{"listingId":"9a5362f1-4130-4774-aa19-bd6454ca883a","source":"github","sourceId":"joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer/academic-polishing","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer/tree/main/skills/academic-polishing","isPrimary":false,"firstSeenAt":"2026-05-18T13:21:57.726Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-18T19:14:18.883Z"}],"details":{"listingId":"9a5362f1-4130-4774-aa19-bd6454ca883a","quickStartSnippet":null,"exampleRequest":null,"exampleResponse":null,"schema":null,"openapiUrl":null,"agentsTxtUrl":null,"citations":[],"useCases":[],"bestFor":[],"notFor":[],"kindDetails":{"org":"joshua-zyy","slug":"academic-polishing","github":{"repo":"joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer","stars":7,"topics":["academic-writing","agent-skills","anthropic-skills","paper-writing","skills"],"license":"mit","html_url":"https://github.com/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer","pushed_at":"2026-05-18T03:40:09Z","description":"面向 CS / AI / ML 领域的证据驱动、分节推进的论文写作 Agent Skill。","skill_md_sha":"9b5f379d7d1e8f94342e33482975961e6c3c8f57","skill_md_path":"skills/academic-polishing/SKILL.md","default_branch":"main","skill_tree_url":"https://github.com/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer/tree/main/skills/academic-polishing"},"layout":"multi","source":"github","category":"academic-paper-writer","frontmatter":{"name":"academic-polishing","description":"Polish academic prose, de-AI-ify text, control claim strength, or rewrite method sections for CS/AI/ML papers. Executes Prose Quality Gate, Claim Strength Audit, and de-AI pass. Use when: removing AI writing patterns from paper text, adjusting claim strength to match evidence level, rewriting method sections with proper narrative flow, improving academic writing quality, checking for overclaiming. Triggers on: 润色, polish, improve writing, 去AI, de-AI, claim strength, 改写, rewrite method, prose quality, 降级表述, remove AI patterns, academic writing polish, 学术润色, 去AI化, 降级结论."},"skills_sh_url":"https://skills.sh/joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer/academic-polishing"},"updatedAt":"2026-05-18T19:14:18.883Z"}}