{"id":"f8ec73a6-cf71-4f6e-918c-ff1f2ddf54c4","shortId":"95hMqW","kind":"skill","title":"peer-review","tagline":"Simulates a full academic journal peer review with EIC decision and 3 independent reviewers (Methodology Expert, Domain Specialist, Devil's Advocate). Scores 1–10, provides major/minor comments, and issues a final verdict: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Use wh","description":"# Peer Review Simulation\n\nSimulate a rigorous journal peer review process with multiple independent reviewers.\n\n## Reviewers\n\n| Role | Focus |\n|------|-------|\n| **Editor-in-Chief (EIC)** | Overall fit, quality, editorial decision |\n| **Reviewer 1 — Methodology Expert** | Research design, statistical rigor, reproducibility |\n| **Reviewer 2 — Domain Specialist** | Theoretical framework, literature coverage, contribution |\n| **Reviewer 3 — Devil's Advocate** | Weaknesses, alternative interpretations, ethical concerns |\n\n## Scoring\n\n- **1–4**: Reject\n- **5–6**: Major revision needed\n- **7–8**: Minor revision; publishable with changes\n- **9–10**: Accept; exceptional work\n\n## Verdicts\n\n- `ACCEPT` — publishable as-is\n- `MINOR_REVISION` — small changes needed; likely accepted after revision\n- `MAJOR_REVISION` — significant work required; re-review needed\n- `REJECT` — fundamental issues; not suitable for this venue\n\n## Output Format\n\n```markdown\n# 🔬 Peer Review Simulation\n\n> **Final Decision: 🟠 Major Revision** | Overall Score: **6/10**\n\n## Editor-in-Chief Decision\n\n**Decision:** 🟠 Major Revision\n**Score:** 6/10\n\n[3–4 sentence editorial summary]\n\n---\n\n## Reviewer Reports\n\n### 🔬 Reviewer 1: Methodology Expert\n\n**Recommendation:** 🟠 Major Revision | **Score:** 6/10\n\n[Overall impression]\n\n**Major Concerns:**\n- [Critical issue 1]\n- [Critical issue 2]\n\n**Minor Suggestions:**\n- [Minor suggestion 1]\n\n---\n[... repeat for each reviewer ...]\n\n## 🟠 Final Decision: Major Revision\n\n### Priority Action Items\n\n- [ ] [Most important revision 1]\n- [ ] [Most important revision 2]\n- [ ] [Most important revision 3]\n\n| Reviewer | Score | Recommendation |\n|----------|-------|----------------|\n| Editor-in-Chief | 6/10 | 🟠 Major Revision |\n| Methodology Expert | 6/10 | 🟠 Major Revision |\n| Domain Specialist | 7/10 | 🟡 Minor Revision |\n| Devil's Advocate | 5/10 | 🟠 Major Revision |\n```\n\n## Guidelines for honest reviews\n\n- Score calibration: theoretical-only papers without original data should score 5–7 max\n- Reviewers must disagree sometimes — a spread of 5–7 across reviewers is healthy\n- Major concerns must reference specific claims or sections in the paper\n- Minor suggestions must be genuinely minor — not disguised major concerns\n- Devil's Advocate must find real weaknesses, not be contrarian for its own sake","tags":["peer","review","archora","skills","richard-kim-79","academic","agent-skills","claude","hypothesis","peer-review","research","science"],"capabilities":["skill","source-richard-kim-79","skill-peer-review","topic-academic","topic-agent-skills","topic-claude","topic-hypothesis","topic-peer-review","topic-research","topic-science"],"categories":["archora-skills"],"synonyms":[],"warnings":[],"endpointUrl":"https://skills.sh/richard-kim-79/archora-skills/peer-review","protocol":"skill","transport":"skills-sh","auth":{"type":"none","details":{"cli":"npx skills add richard-kim-79/archora-skills","source_repo":"https://github.com/richard-kim-79/archora-skills","install_from":"skills.sh"}},"qualityScore":"0.468","qualityRationale":"deterministic score 0.47 from registry signals: · indexed on github topic:agent-skills · 37 github stars · SKILL.md body (2,329 chars)","verified":false,"liveness":"unknown","lastLivenessCheck":null,"agentReviews":{"count":0,"score_avg":null,"cost_usd_avg":null,"success_rate":null,"latency_p50_ms":null,"narrative_summary":null,"summary_updated_at":null},"enrichmentModel":"deterministic:skill-github:v1","enrichmentVersion":1,"enrichedAt":"2026-05-18T18:58:32.556Z","embedding":null,"createdAt":"2026-05-15T13:05:45.128Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-18T18:58:32.556Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-18T18:58:32.556Z","tsv":"'1':26,73,101,184,198,206,221 '10':27,117 '2':82,201,225 '3':15,91,176,229 '4':102,177 '5':104,271,281 '5/10':253 '6':105 '6/10':165,175,191,237,242 '7':109,272,282 '7/10':247 '8':110 '9':116 'academ':7 'accept':36,118,122,133 'across':283 'action':216 'advoc':24,94,252,310 'altern':96 'as-i':124 'calibr':261 'chang':115,130 'chief':65,169,236 'claim':292 'comment':30 'concern':99,195,288,307 'contrarian':317 'contribut':89 'coverag':88 'critic':196,199 'data':268 'decis':13,71,160,170,171,212 'design':77 'devil':22,92,250,308 'disagre':276 'disguis':305 'domain':20,83,245 'editor':63,167,234 'editor-in-chief':62,166,233 'editori':70,179 'eic':12,66 'ethic':98 'except':119 'expert':19,75,186,241 'final':34,159,211 'find':312 'fit':68 'focus':61 'format':154 'framework':86 'full':6 'fundament':146 'genuin':302 'guidelin':256 'healthi':286 'honest':258 'import':219,223,227 'impress':193 'independ':16,57 'interpret':97 'issu':32,147,197,200 'item':217 'journal':8,51 'like':132 'literatur':87 'major':39,106,136,161,172,188,194,213,238,243,254,287,306 'major/minor':29 'markdown':155 'max':273 'methodolog':18,74,185,240 'minor':37,111,127,202,204,248,298,303 'multipl':56 'must':275,289,300,311 'need':108,131,144 'origin':267 'output':153 'overal':67,163,192 'paper':265,297 'peer':2,9,45,52,156 'peer-review':1 'prioriti':215 'process':54 'provid':28 'publish':113,123 'qualiti':69 're':142 're-review':141 'real':313 'recommend':187,232 'refer':290 'reject':42,103,145 'repeat':207 'report':182 'reproduc':80 'requir':140 'research':76 'review':3,10,17,46,53,58,59,72,81,90,143,157,181,183,210,230,259,274,284 'revis':38,40,107,112,128,135,137,162,173,189,214,220,224,228,239,244,249,255 'rigor':50,79 'role':60 'sake':321 'score':25,100,164,174,190,231,260,270 'section':294 'sentenc':178 'signific':138 'simul':4,47,48,158 'skill' 'skill-peer-review' 'small':129 'sometim':277 'source-richard-kim-79' 'specialist':21,84,246 'specif':291 'spread':279 'statist':78 'suggest':203,205,299 'suitabl':149 'summari':180 'theoret':85,263 'theoretical-on':262 'topic-academic' 'topic-agent-skills' 'topic-claude' 'topic-hypothesis' 'topic-peer-review' 'topic-research' 'topic-science' 'use':43 'venu':152 'verdict':35,121 'weak':95,314 'wh':44 'without':266 'work':120,139","prices":[{"id":"f63d5f47-ccb5-466a-ad6c-495b52973fcd","listingId":"f8ec73a6-cf71-4f6e-918c-ff1f2ddf54c4","amountUsd":"0","unit":"free","nativeCurrency":null,"nativeAmount":null,"chain":null,"payTo":null,"paymentMethod":"skill-free","isPrimary":true,"details":{"org":"richard-kim-79","category":"archora-skills","install_from":"skills.sh"},"createdAt":"2026-05-15T13:05:45.128Z"}],"sources":[{"listingId":"f8ec73a6-cf71-4f6e-918c-ff1f2ddf54c4","source":"github","sourceId":"richard-kim-79/archora-skills/peer-review","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/richard-kim-79/archora-skills/tree/main/skills/peer-review","isPrimary":false,"firstSeenAt":"2026-05-15T13:05:45.128Z","lastSeenAt":"2026-05-18T18:58:32.556Z"}],"details":{"listingId":"f8ec73a6-cf71-4f6e-918c-ff1f2ddf54c4","quickStartSnippet":null,"exampleRequest":null,"exampleResponse":null,"schema":null,"openapiUrl":null,"agentsTxtUrl":null,"citations":[],"useCases":[],"bestFor":[],"notFor":[],"kindDetails":{"org":"richard-kim-79","slug":"peer-review","github":{"repo":"richard-kim-79/archora-skills","stars":37,"topics":["academic","agent-skills","claude","hypothesis","peer-review","research","science"],"license":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/richard-kim-79/archora-skills","pushed_at":"2026-05-15T06:05:22Z","description":"Academic research agent skills for Claude Code and other Agent Skills-compatible tools. Hypothesis generation, experiment design, paper drafting, peer review simulation, and more.","skill_md_sha":"949cb3ee69efa8157b91e35f443064aecb3ffd03","skill_md_path":"skills/peer-review/SKILL.md","default_branch":"main","skill_tree_url":"https://github.com/richard-kim-79/archora-skills/tree/main/skills/peer-review"},"layout":"multi","source":"github","category":"archora-skills","frontmatter":{"name":"peer-review","license":"MIT","description":"Simulates a full academic journal peer review with EIC decision and 3 independent reviewers (Methodology Expert, Domain Specialist, Devil's Advocate). Scores 1–10, provides major/minor comments, and issues a final verdict: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. Use when the user asks for a peer review, journal-quality feedback, readiness assessment, or to simulate reviewer responses before submission."},"skills_sh_url":"https://skills.sh/richard-kim-79/archora-skills/peer-review"},"updatedAt":"2026-05-18T18:58:32.556Z"}}